IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.txt

Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Wed, 18 November 2020 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679E13A044A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 05:53:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qe_zeJxT1NeS for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 05:53:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD7BC3A0365 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 05:53:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id j31so1591688qtb.8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 05:53:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XnEKgLsJeQ8ZVlEwUkW5AiUKyer1D4BgCLh8C9T2IKw=; b=AF1Fr8TPjWIz2DPnPbT31BYZhkBZxM5AdDixyEbYyo154sqmS78NimwSD+w7qyE0HI jXteiAl8HiqIlePWpy6dcnvs9v27BGctqMMQymuZCVeLfsaRfPenns5tVwAMV6gGB/A+ cnYzdDwN5ApjeRXmMPg0bhZU9Tsc7tGivt4ZpjeJK0LVRXF40cTc6pWDmE+5HBRDe18c QOUM7GAZ9n1mW7wR0e5Gyzj90ceFZmShffGKk2Gs1IJIWSqPEBb8JoilN3o43peghy70 8+Jv2n63OTmMaNqMW+eG90SmXc3Wxy+rvMd8yGY4Z6/RsVwiKLa32SKfgsddbCQuqGvt p5IQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=XnEKgLsJeQ8ZVlEwUkW5AiUKyer1D4BgCLh8C9T2IKw=; b=QxKclgNK2kyHeGbiJLfORJJ4L3QTMd0oLM1x/Fbk9eaQcFa1d+X30Ak0bzxNfGWWPD ITumOm+HN0oPodq+BCPYW2fYBwnZx6BBDBWDLlTniRa2nNZbWNGf7oiAQVe1G2PnrmDN USIG/94iYNAoEFj5nQRm7scsiioikVu9O9bMs7pLhA9mf96SsCuvT4wT6iMhv+HhMaH1 M+lfLhepgZOYAfX1oL7/os2BdhZJeKvkp/M3DAAo1mQsoah4YQ7uXeZ33HhKUXxNBMI3 Hisc6v1C8CUKoriyo5rwpR11aoUBhfvvU2Vj39cJWk1UQzs7zBexNZXY/VM+9c95tnzc 6jRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312wScti7W4AhiXhzCusP83avyBp3z2qoX6ShpDBmztTJ+8RBGA ROPpD+GRsFxfEJC3c23LslY5o+W7ZyF5NHli242JtJf4TIc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzeXatFx9PTDSFndGmGtKXgPbb8sTumIiACARs2HPZEIrRB3ZImyiz8omc4K15R8nPQFGsgM5T6NTVKlJvcoSM=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5412:: with SMTP id b18mr4898515qtq.220.1605707583404; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 05:53:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160513169495.16356.6565556939968267867@ietfa.amsl.com> <a21528cf-d048-6b3c-bb40-bd27658c268c@digilicious.com> <CAL0qLwYxAGzO-kbUTD7y0OMCG0DezgTqs+YdqzqGG_DzurihbA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYxAGzO-kbUTD7y0OMCG0DezgTqs+YdqzqGG_DzurihbA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:52:47 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHej_8nTqSkYibdKTHDCSE5PVr_JX5Qv_siVsWvAfpjvAB6O0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001f541005b461ee7a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Uwizmvd099ubDf_GI_eA_pFvNTg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:53:06 -0000

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 1:55 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:57 AM Gene Hightower <dmarc@digilicious.com>
> wrote:
>
>> From the document:
>>
>> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-00.html:>
>>
>> > 4.1. Authentication Mechanisms
>>
>> > The following mechanisms for determining Authenticated Identifiers
>> > are supported in this version of DMARC: […]
>>
>> > [RFC3986], which can authenticate both the domain found in an
>> > [RFC5322] HELO/EHLO command (the HELO identity) and the domain found
>> > in an SMTP MAIL command (the MAIL FROM identity). DMARC uses the
>> > result of SPF authentication of the MAIL FROM identity. Section 2.4
>> > of [RFC7208] describes MAIL FROM processing for cases in which the
>> > MAIL command has a null path.
>>
>> RFC-3986 is titled “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax.”
>> I suspect a reference to RFC-7208 was intended here.
>>
>
> This error actually exists in at least two other locations in the document.
>
>
>
Noted.

I'll open an issue and make sure the document is updated.

-- 

*Todd Herr* | Sr. Technical Program Manager
*e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
*p:* 703.220.4153


This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email