Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Wed, 10 July 2019 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69AF120247 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.693
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.693 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ZGAl-ptFtiG for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8834120222 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id t28so3764989lje.9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HFwGTTLeBu80h9uLQOPkHydBObprerNUpVvYwfn/MJA=; b=HGTLIYAsEtBY078KFofbfWAFGMoSJYDVJ7bFwGqXVJVAsC/Z8fQDeDsfX3xFpUCiQt f+FPMQBdesmbPl1/HUEHEmBjYNazwXhrRLIa2fBCdAWYPap72dMFSPUxAu7zr6tJIYGQ MqxFpyvRgCzx82ZK8STCFKZbBKssodEM0MA78=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HFwGTTLeBu80h9uLQOPkHydBObprerNUpVvYwfn/MJA=; b=gt6el6/KemEdNTspyieL+MxA1ko/tmAVFXQgZ2QcQ+1L1w6Ehe6qpFfDauRuWhXjew iBcD/K6Gf2RFfKHqS/X+NACmSKN15zNRUAT5HBrhbgK4PdgQozbtmS+kZp/IIOgjRaZB vhHranodUBpVu70Zb+KMEEOZUVfkXUSQvDTvinR3hEzlSbk+CBeb3YUUj32M7hdAHqkJ 7HHUz5QN1/M69VCJ8uCiH8tHpzWeaDr5Jyq796bc+NyoFlypYauqkOogneBwIkkZmhLF NhFugAr+MMHotKsVMIKfN7ghxWG+hgJI+7x9lc7vB9hAh/f2NY2GT19gsiTmnMQDbfcC AVuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXATDZodgLMf352H8NrgrRPRM/Eigbcadg+44CjdR8pZIcvwKGB 2ORfiW4BR7fmOcNT0j8hjDcarorTKr6TwvzUO98=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwP1yyJp1FDwAqgub2uEbHCx398jKa769pmnC5Q2SnNmpex3wKshSqfo+y7Gflxkudr7/bWNUoMZoLm5aCeWHc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:4e12:: with SMTP id c18mr392995ljb.211.1562800236774; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwbbz_UhBLsURg=eXhRBC2g9OghiN==T9Uq9pFuLtd=b7w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfN0+nxpN1P_nk3y5f8MTQ=c7DYNvYic2iDMuCK_bNa=qg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfM9BPLz6UR1bLTrE30dsWLv3k=UNNbGDGCrAfT7Op7FGg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfM9BPLz6UR1bLTrE30dsWLv3k=UNNbGDGCrAfT7Op7FGg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:10:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1qt12HF=mQQa_S4SHC14VbAau=kER2F3AzJqHpPauDcLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Seth Blank <seth=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f7d962058d5bc819"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/VIW5p4P0j6R8NySjYZK-BhbjkTg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:10:42 -0000

I, for one, would *really* like to see the rumored "next version" from
Scott and prefer to comment on that one, rather than an at-best penultimate
version.

--Kurt

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 1:21 PM Seth Blank <seth=
40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; wrote:

> There is one week left before WGLC closes, and the below three items still
> need resolution. Please speak up!
>
> -- Seth, as Secretary
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 2:21 PM Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>; wrote:
>
>> As Secretary, there are three items that have not yet reached consensus
>> that must be resolved during WGLC:
>>
>> 1. What further context is needed in the introduction
>> 2. If explicit call outs to ICANN/limited operator capacity to implement
>> are needed
>> 3. If an np= tag is needed to allow PSD functioning for only NXDOMAINs
>>
>> Seth
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 2:08 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>;
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This message begins Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd,
>>> which is currently at version 04.  An 05 may appear shortly with some text
>>> changes that were previously discussed on the list; these do not include
>>> any technical changes (I believe) so the author is free to update with only
>>> those changes as planned.
>>>
>>> Please review the document and submit your feedback by Wednesday, July
>>> 17th.  We would ideally like to have enough responses to support our claim
>>> to the IESG that the document clearly has working group consensus.
>>>
>>> Note that we will be in pre-meeting draft embargo at that time so a new
>>> version dealing with any feeback cannot appear until IETF 105 begins on the
>>> 22nd.
>>>
>>> I'm planning to do my own review as the document shepherd with an eye
>>> toward consumption by readers with only a passing familiarity with DMARC.
>>> If anyone wants to join me in looking at it through that lens, you'd be
>>> welcome.
>>>
>>> -MSK, co-chairin'
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmarc mailing list
>>> dmarc@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>
> *Seth Blank* | Director, Industry Initiatives
> *e:* seth@valimail.com
> *p:* 415.273.8818
>
>
>
> This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential
>
> and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of
>
> individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended
>
> and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use,
>
> disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in
>
> this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please
>
> immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then
>
> delete it from your system.
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>