IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] NXDOMAIN

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 08 April 2021 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8A83A1634 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 11:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=KFtUwOZD; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=ZdpNzkpq
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y1T3DlxQMz8D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 11:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0521A3A162B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 11:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 76086 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2021 18:29:49 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=12934.606f4b9d.k2104; bh=fo/dvsOeBa7fFsdZxJ2uKsXtAvbzDegbzbNIURJ9ASo=; b=KFtUwOZDMz92Fw4IHMZuxd3VkzfxQRUscIQJnu6MnXRPUvGr/3sxDbh8RPEZ2RrX7GiZmMdDAwH+DEYgcUuQTz87TGx+budlKm0A5zj4fREPWUl/SV24a8stfrP9Dejvlk10/zl3TO19eg4ENiR5u2YSsJ33PUvDi13kAkNAOAduMfgZKLNS1jat8oug1kiKnQAbTlmzMV1sWXEvMb8traelTwAyqvoceu0Mh+WlnJCTHCqhAWZ9XkAmSMYXCBEWkzn8vHcC8BFIa7w+tc29F1XOqjs0LGSI6vEemeJwk/NPij3si1sfu65wkoj5iOXK71lHx4Px6Ztm05OPxM34Qw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=12934.606f4b9d.k2104; bh=fo/dvsOeBa7fFsdZxJ2uKsXtAvbzDegbzbNIURJ9ASo=; b=ZdpNzkpqt7rRQkRoFDrs0rlgJ1Fk3kylp4Yc3dsIIxKCPb0MeHpomN4kJvn1Be2QXKketutcGKkheDAD3FlAVfOHSFs6Qr1AvkNgnj8mPjEhnYvt+/2VseppcgfI/cOkU8LQz6py66JDINsxYcX9YUgItVNHEufhrfZstS6ZyDNnGugZVp407OcoYOTxGHpGG5LGMTHIP2xfHF/JdfPSFyi5I5dtg9VWUWpP2jJoskBACB8jeMja6iggsFG1FBKoghvCCflEMgXEvpe2VnRIfliyOb24XpAdcetBnvLvHQkxl8obVKvvXYpddh7mdWKCPPVjYVOGK0HJmmL/XHK/Lw==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 08 Apr 2021 18:29:48 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5E4AF7282ACE; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 14:29:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 14:29:47 -0400
Message-Id: <20210408182948.5E4AF7282ACE@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: superuser@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYr+w1hjV3Wez6xd96OmmXjYU3D=-4+2qfCxkQ5TVA+Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/VTWDNVLZXvNUnBzE5KRQzluC494>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] NXDOMAIN
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 18:29:57 -0000

It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy  <superuser@gmail.com> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 9:50 AM Douglas Foster <
>dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Why is it problematic to document this risk, and indicate that when "No
>> Policy detected" occurs, it is recommended to check whether the domain
>> exists, and if it does not exist then local policy for nonexistent domains
>> should be applied?
>>
>
>Can you put together an example message exhibiting the properties you're
>talking about, and what DNS records are in play in that scenario?
>
>I still can't picture the problem you're trying to solve.

My question would be what does it have to do with DMARC.

We already have policies for dealing with non-existent domains unrelated to DMARC.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email