IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 16 April 2020 03:42 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2D23A0BB0; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4LO4XK5GYD5L; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe35.google.com (mail-vs1-xe35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CB7A3A0B9B; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe35.google.com with SMTP id g24so1517987vsp.8; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ywLx5HsYQ+HvOAIghQfjc3K4xpP8kuBOlpNDQmxIDac=; b=BuoIAkfB2Rh6Y3cKUPO9Oz4PSDexf2wSQjhDct8K4K4NnZh/E6lgxJrQRMm41L9mOH 4q6d4LdXm1o4P8P5aqMkM/rckZAdoypGDKUbB8DaKoQgSyvWjAQDE4zWQ43JXMQ3wZaP jq2Q6bdirlJ4liO6LdDcs4UE+G1ZkMJHwipt8W7Kbp6ARI4dySxwe/gLvTFBDKn/LIFw kMov3Zhdb9QTyNuC3CUKKt8pF6x4yXq5hYqfbaWXfzvNyQxIkyuiZuVrBbGNYXp8Bm8Y NJ04wIFkA7utAyIZSSAS0vtyUJWL6Vr9o2QtNREFO/TkWhplmWXCX2+HLaZvLaGo6uba WYVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ywLx5HsYQ+HvOAIghQfjc3K4xpP8kuBOlpNDQmxIDac=; b=IdQdJd7nsdxZ8wfwvrvZaEdoD18oyCnPdd8IaQpZz2SWbZHBvVUjvuFBAc1QOe4oLL QX6mm03VZjNBHN/GFgXu2KTB0lEz9nMvX81vriIOvGfdAGT8hF6bt4v5VRvMYV056VLZ QJ91HMFFnrnVKDEf96wWSmPu9iiRp1HcfSz46tn0J/uBZ9b4QU0erfmE9FJx0s8eL9bp Yqqcr/3P6sKVanueDSOsfOkCcmpc0B9SItVcXi0QYi6/OI9XRcGp+XHUMtHyk8Vcrr+5 AUIWSD9SVrdr/5sd41yNL8aTnFICrDUtJpmmZxbxVKkhczVjCMcAlNhpk3/CY5ZQKrev DVrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZTUGgeclpjLgKNd9UQEiF99QgaT5I9ulsseYkBeTK18515gIU9 Bn2Smi7AdEnvJXoQP1R8h9++7kH7OLXKYZCUYYY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIz5UhFXb+OTQ2TJbWh3c7x2RhF3b6AAT+KnhrODagSh5V8uKBGh5CghQ8PD1faN3oPyR9QQXM0H95IkYn5Tbw=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:7c44:: with SMTP id x65mr7379773vsc.52.1587008558343; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <873694nosf.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <5104491.njhNTWfIiN@sk-desktop> <CAD2i3WNUQO5257Fy369+mcY19iToQTOvDXLF5jk7CKE92ZUZNA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwb9CnCCUi0G4wX5fJ-F4-NOnakTNgcOyGAozZjo-po=Qg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwb9CnCCUi0G4wX5fJ-F4-NOnakTNgcOyGAozZjo-po=Qg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:42:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbSFTJU28f7Nm=7-R-6T6iNreb4M7eeSgA1rJwgPJGQ+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com>
Cc: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dmarc-psd.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000602d8705a3603985"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/VfnErn0kiZm_ZOQGFroBI2skgic>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 03:42:41 -0000

Apologies:

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:39 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1.  If even a small number of people (and the GenART review itself might
> be enough) thinks it's in need of this kind of improvement, I would be
> surprised if the IESG sends it back to the working group for revision.  If
> the goal is to get this thing published so people can start conducting the
> experiment, putting the work in now can only help you.
>

*wouldn't

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email