Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Wed, 17 July 2019 04:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80D512000F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=WVrEj3o/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=qd8DAgrE
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O8beJ324ZvNw for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D409120058 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E5D4F805B5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:40:31 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1563338431; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=TtXe8oFJ7lhKSXbVAICPMKCHtdQsHbfdFBRKK4W+loU=; b=WVrEj3o/xcx9kbOZPm2sIhMICDWxwPCgehUjOpgz3Dj9HZk4ACboZnqX +6Hc841sPJ73XxPI3QbCpA1J9+QCAw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1563338431; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=TtXe8oFJ7lhKSXbVAICPMKCHtdQsHbfdFBRKK4W+loU=; b=qd8DAgrEi8jAliwJCK0Mjjjr7k8kNti+Il1nxxwB8D4fLPy/oohPmQ+r twnvO+8wg9seIl+XofrHc8NN6ZsJNQXhWpw4WnsyX4TqwjL1l9ZtvSfFdV dE2Ya5Em/yZa1chvgDDFxzn82OOFza46KdMkRykOr8KNZwvML5qas+BkVu 1FKUq7L1ioqOBGr3VKH0f1yAqmckW9q4SeFhJqkLjOI6FgEdDhc8omtr9/ IShGrOM9mmR5198QEFOZRfB0H5zds0fsrhqC8ijk4mNZC2/Uq50QlajfOf a9BzhrO1nxdfFlQXCUh6hwlpTub5u+JYv9pvPGkxw6Vxiv3H5UTkNw==
Received: from l5580.localnet (wsip-68-224-171-140.sd.sd.cox.net [68.224.171.140]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B297F8008C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:40:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:40:29 -0400
Message-ID: <5967921.XLnl7RJ6Z0@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <LO2P123MB2334D79A532D6A6514C00BA1ADCE0@LO2P123MB2334.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <CAL0qLwbbz_UhBLsURg=eXhRBC2g9OghiN==T9Uq9pFuLtd=b7w@mail.gmail.com> <4789054.Ip9ilXyiH0@l5580> <LO2P123MB2334D79A532D6A6514C00BA1ADCE0@LO2P123MB2334.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Vph2Wqw1pDt6a9LTJz_CfHxXk4E>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 04:41:06 -0000

Fixed.  Thanks.

Scott K

On Tuesday, July 16, 2019 4:20:12 AM EDT Richard C wrote:
> I'm happy with the proposal but just wanted to flag that you have a typo for
> the tag name in section 3.3 - you use 'sp' rather than 'np'
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Richard
> 
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: dmarc <dmarc-bounces@ietf.org>; On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
> | Sent: 13 July 2019 20:35
> | To: dmarc@ietf.org
> | Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group
> | Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
> | 
> | On Friday, July 12, 2019 2:28:39 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> | > On Friday, July 12, 2019 1:54:57 PM EDT Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> | > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:50 AM Scott Kitterman
> | > > <sklist@kitterman.com>;
> | > > 
> | > > wrote:
> | > > > On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> | > > > > 3. If an np= tag is needed to allow PSD functioning for only
> | > > > > NXDOMAINs
> | > > > 
> | > > > The limited feedback during WGLC has been favorable to this.
> | > > > 
> | > > > This will require a rather larger change to the document than the
> | > > > other issues, but they are manageable and I believe I have most of
> | > > > the relevant text from earlier revisions.
> | > > > 
> | > > > I think we should include this.
> | > > 
> | > > I am much more concerned with adding another tag that can only be
> | > > used in a PSD-DMARC record. I would be much more open to make a
> | > > "normative" change to the DMARC tag list (RFC 7489 section 11.4) to
> | > > define np for any DMARC record, than to make this a special case for
> | > > PSD-DMARC records.
> | > 
> | > I agree.  My intent is to add the tag to be used experimentally for
> | > any DMARC record.  Part of the experiment is to see if it's useful
> | > beyond
> | 
> | PSD.
> | 
> | Attached is my proposed text to add the np tag.  Based on the discussion
> | to
> | date, I assume I'll be asked to add something like this after last call is
> | complete, so please let me know how to make it better.
> | 
> | Scott K
> | This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
> | (FOIA)
> | and may be exempt under other UK information legislation. Refer any FOIA
> | queries to ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk
> 
> This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA)
> and may be exempt under other UK information legislation. Refer any FOIA
> queries to ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc