Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Fixed.  Thanks.

Scott K

On Tuesday, July 16, 2019 4:20:12 AM EDT Richard C wrote:
> I'm happy with the proposal but just wanted to flag that you have a typo for
> the tag name in section 3.3 - you use 'sp' rather than 'np'
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Richard
> 
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: dmarc <dmarc-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
> | Sent: 13 July 2019 20:35
> | To: dmarc@ietf.org
> | Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group
> | Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
> | 
> | On Friday, July 12, 2019 2:28:39 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> | > On Friday, July 12, 2019 1:54:57 PM EDT Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> | > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:50 AM Scott Kitterman
> | > > <sklist@kitterman.com>
> | > > 
> | > > wrote:
> | > > > On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> | > > > > 3. If an np= tag is needed to allow PSD functioning for only
> | > > > > NXDOMAINs
> | > > > 
> | > > > The limited feedback during WGLC has been favorable to this.
> | > > > 
> | > > > This will require a rather larger change to the document than the
> | > > > other issues, but they are manageable and I believe I have most of
> | > > > the relevant text from earlier revisions.
> | > > > 
> | > > > I think we should include this.
> | > > 
> | > > I am much more concerned with adding another tag that can only be
> | > > used in a PSD-DMARC record. I would be much more open to make a
> | > > "normative" change to the DMARC tag list (RFC 7489 section 11.4) to
> | > > define np for any DMARC record, than to make this a special case for
> | > > PSD-DMARC records.
> | > 
> | > I agree.  My intent is to add the tag to be used experimentally for
> | > any DMARC record.  Part of the experiment is to see if it's useful
> | > beyond
> | 
> | PSD.
> | 
> | Attached is my proposed text to add the np tag.  Based on the discussion
> | to
> | date, I assume I'll be asked to add something like this after last call is
> | complete, so please let me know how to make it better.
> | 
> | Scott K
> | This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
> | (FOIA)
> | and may be exempt under other UK information legislation. Refer any FOIA
> | queries to ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk
> 
> This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA)
> and may be exempt under other UK information legislation. Refer any FOIA
> queries to ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc