Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Fri, 02 August 2019 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09390120750 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id unV90pjxY7Hv for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C09BE120746 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id z3so12654632iog.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pWlYAx4EjgUeRh1iMbpM+8UBUZO5fOH64WDWAMVRzOE=; b=D30l/ZZFm9WFFaE16zf/6rdlhtxvViBOy6wcKUh4kTG2cY/i+kU6pkl0vpJoP1/gA5 eZMlnBEYSueJ7zsGplSpcZpKC9R2vJXKqqrbSAH4WNvtyOkR62qq84cro81YYRTm8211 nc7wNPNKta18Lz8jLTsoOevFiY2gxLXIrhnfo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pWlYAx4EjgUeRh1iMbpM+8UBUZO5fOH64WDWAMVRzOE=; b=CMsrd3GHyDr/ia4mVJu+V+hXaBB8w68buD3WvWi9+bO8kHDuAVjl1p30h8clQEIKZ2 iz9kNVvcVe0skgRTn1sbIzZp0ftB5yE/NJQiZv3GynXzWqWFi33RUM/kqXrH6Qu9sYVP ljXj8UjhtQ6grD3fXOgQfyVYPuszuuOMNQLRbhaarwgDqxAx+tDDxL/J5FkhBnA/r51L zDrC17yXRtoQlvy1iwKHF/VQaxMZlV9P6T3XDqtijOTePXR14fQt6M/hFAf3teeBXHcQ 6+EPq6cjr4R3eJfLVERsuXEPyDCY6bckU6cvsXLlniPQVBE4kZK9KAvyU5qep+CaajMS lZ4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUwRLR15SiDLSx8CWFoIDFtuRhC2AuXBsN08BHHCxjRsVIGyC33 gMZOfiOs9fmfmNciVNEUKRzAN3g5eaLxu4O28dVmbHORok8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwiUEzSwGXNrIJ08GU8VgFL0zJtcyghL6p1KiNVtw96WyBe14wEgkV3eW0OrAEYiyLG4BxLl2qD2Z1/ROcR138=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:f607:: with SMTP id n7mr90259653ioh.263.1564766585634; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e580ada3-d9b5-0e5b-9ac3-eade41ac92d2@tana.it> <CAL0qLwa5yR5dVzkDSD48MDgpUa11+ri=KOwrNSqOxi8fB2i6PA@mail.gmail.com> <eabefc6b-7542-1a46-4272-b786433ed0b5@tana.it> <4783309.BXR8ZdE9c3@l5580> <CAL0qLwb5FAaYZ7AX_H=aeUFkv8cvY+xd1bQ5uCDp4tmrbx2CQg@mail.gmail.com> <7a21b80b-e6bb-d8b9-cf63-601a8d1e47e7@tana.it> <C1E711A8-F3A6-4A20-B71D-53FA773A61D9@kitterman.com> <aca25d30-3b01-4eaf-6d0b-3bae6f3f796b@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <aca25d30-3b01-4eaf-6d0b-3bae6f3f796b@tana.it>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:22:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1ogeUjW181MMOv3kApZR5njMMH6_84EnHxF0tDq6bhBkA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007e5507058f259cc7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/VyF12igAuq9AHCO609VrCc3GHIU>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 17:23:09 -0000

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 3:00 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

>   To stick with A-R semantics, it should have been named
> tcp.ip, remote.ip or some such.
>

Note that  RFC8617 section 10.2 (
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8617#section-10.2) does add in an
smtp.remote-ip method item.

--Kurt