Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC WG Interim meeting Proposal -- request for group feedback on timing and participation

Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net> Fri, 07 May 2021 03:57 UTC

Return-Path: <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D3D3A141C; Thu, 6 May 2021 20:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bluepopcorn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mLVQXY4zxT0c; Thu, 6 May 2021 20:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from v2.bluepopcorn.net (v2.bluepopcorn.net [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a994::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 742573A13A3; Thu, 6 May 2021 20:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bluepopcorn.net; s=supersize; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nIfc4JOYkMP4JNsDO7baITKRX2DFkDf1iefknabkgkY=; b=eHy31aUxJOOaFr+cFQMWfwTuDi XmhSF1nOc1GSUX5Rvj9WRhRnhqt6GndsM+k5ZILw5VSS54Mfrk3P6+d736UJKPQh/rnBBTcCi2Kvs oYQtQxk1HYXzLBJgMnzCZi3i/OQU3q8ra2PWJpJDzP61Y1m/L0y+qGexoHy1DXkqFv3U=;
Received: from [2601:647:4400:1261:edb8:7251:ca91:59e] (helo=[10.10.20.144]) by v2.bluepopcorn.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>) id 1lerc5-00045c-24; Thu, 06 May 2021 20:57:17 -0700
From: "Jim Fenton" <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
To: "Seth Blank" <seth=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "IETF DMARC WG" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 20:57:15 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5757)
Message-ID: <ABB66EED-681C-44AB-8EEA-C62EBD5F526D@bluepopcorn.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfPC-m05PkXOVJWSw2Wx8zVx285sa6LE7V08c4gG7rLMCg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOZAAfPC-m05PkXOVJWSw2Wx8zVx285sa6LE7V08c4gG7rLMCg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_62AE902F-1930-4D4E-B80A-8D87035A28B8_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/W-OnLjFxbWufYk_rXktaXYay-UA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC WG Interim meeting Proposal -- request for group feedback on timing and participation
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 03:57:26 -0000

On 5 May 2021, at 21:26, Seth Blank wrote:

> Barry and I propose Thursday, May 27th, from 9-11am PT / 12-2pm ET / 
> 4-6pm
> GMT.

2) I wish to participate in the interim, but the timing does not work

(Unless some standing meetings get cancelled). But it looks like I’m 
the only one, so have fun, everyone.

-Jim