Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 20 January 2021 01:54 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1984A3A0BEB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:54:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=X53ZXUXm; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=U3v6Y3gD
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vDmIquGEJFG8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:54:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 788703A0BE9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:54:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 12073 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2021 01:54:29 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=2f23.60078d55.k2101; bh=S7sszjuR8tkRKdzRwkxb/UYyqQHW7wuX6UsTodo8GPc=; b=X53ZXUXmfKd2oupNkrYW7u74PTl2wmGmjAiXndSbDfeq9F5+rksB9lnIv1PJp1PeKicKqh/wrT/KSZRtPfHkxXHzvcUy9E1yK9q1pY5i5wFZMiO/QtIqzXo2XfVhS107UjkIBKFeesRcdL4WtVbAntlwuSofm4gMa12LrpyONjOQPFM8sPyKEBGpysZWY9ClWF0nrsxWt9/CfyJaU+9zD7Zijx7ElHESfi7LoJ+btSrdE/fekU42xroRTqscsQBxe4LtxWTtEykXAlYk0t4UsRfZI0Se7IVKnR3/IdnFv/8xqeb1NgEWS/B6laarGc6Z7xTNlagrmfMdSEKUNGogWg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=2f23.60078d55.k2101; bh=S7sszjuR8tkRKdzRwkxb/UYyqQHW7wuX6UsTodo8GPc=; b=U3v6Y3gDP2/FTnD33SrkBqvvrvpOfHlK9BMpLzCrsIjT1k+K3nw3CTSHzwBa+swfR1fBqJVgM1m6NqpyuEjyqF6bHpYr/GUgG0pi67dASdhXVbd93Az/4bvjeSO6Hj/449qLfKfhvo2doFHKjstCmcvVvgWxG3JSHXTS7m8VWqXDA7hSR5tAMiB95I2JrC/6OSFRfvg6C1nchMlBPf7NbIh15Ttd8nW7T+JQvNZKo7/9lHX6/Cm3UI227OR5cr+PEZ9ZxjvxW4Ad1UzBu8JJ85hxAsIi8OV+S0OUQobF5HCX+30YeGyvnoek6oAJNILGdbp18E8rhpo0ZQCeJta4Fg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 20 Jan 2021 01:54:29 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id C8A026B7BB7D; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:54:28 -0500 (EST)
Date: 19 Jan 2021 20:54:28 -0500
Message-Id: <20210120015428.C8A026B7BB7D@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: todd.herr@valimail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAHej_8=BJPezpi2KZ7GX-N__4Fqfc_b8vFNhu7_Typakv4iMig@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/WcWxe-pHl201boJOkicuT46FARc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #42 - Expand DMARC reporting URI functionality
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 01:54:36 -0000

In article <CAHej_8=BJPezpi2KZ7GX-N__4Fqfc_b8vFNhu7_Typakv4iMig@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>My mention of "other concerns ... about privacy and security" is in
>reference to a post in this thread that Mike Hammer made in early December,
>where he wrote:
>
>"I don't recall a strong security and privacy concerns discussion around
>HTTP(S) reporting. Presumably the report contents are protected in transit
>but to what extent is access by arbitrary parties an issue. Notwithstanding
>that things like GDPR are political issues, they are worth noting as a real
>life operational consideration."

I saw this but I still don't understand it. The chances of an HTTP
POST getting snooped on are far less than any kind of e-mail.

R's,
John