Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 10:34 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 4:05 AM Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've asked here and in other places that validators/receivers consuming
>> ARC headers provide data regarding the results of such consumption. To date
>> we have not seen any data provided by participants in the ARC experiment.
>> It may be that ARC is a useful standard or it may not be. So far I'm seeing
>> a lot of supposition and speculation but no useful data for evaluation.
>>
>
> I wonder if we might ask our compatriots at M3AAWG if they might be
> willing or able to undertake a data collection project in this area.  Most
> of the ARC proponents are also participants there.
>

This data collection is taking place at M3AAWG; Kurt Andersen is leading,
with myself and Todd Herr supporting. However, this got slowed dramatically
due to COVID-- we won't realistically see data that's useful to this
working group for another few months. In the meantime, ARC discussions
continue between many international receivers, and the DMARC WG chairs are
being kept in the loop. Once there's something material to bring back, that
will happen publicly.

> -MSK
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>

-- 

*Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies
*e:* seth@valimail.com
*p:* 415.273.8818

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.