Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change

Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> Tue, 18 August 2020 01:15 UTC

Return-Path: <dotzero@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555CC3A155C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bgNAAKbdfkNe for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A07F3A1559 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com with SMTP id x6so8785612qvr.8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ooV+Td/4/ql4xRBTxPBB8vaBZb1tK1nCmIAWq1XMg1k=; b=ZHx/XtdJRWYAFjMXx0mSWf9kRdeaVyNR24zAz4r65ErdPBcg2+XUfvZkZujjNNyke/ AL73kSHVwMgzQ6hvIWHDJ0wYsAHuQ+bBdUUCUpPNkJH1Y1M1LLl7KnbngWZ4uwQw0MUf w+TW8W07HKOz4jf5u120HeoQUYgrzmTk47lZ/ZoBXCV4Iv5hxcc1UpxQpbCBpAOGha0V +hfBoGzZyc9ylGtlAtA99p+BfCVqg6T76GDw33GPRnEE7f4JuKbuOvLSde12JdOf4DxD 5DO0+75b1JXH6BRVe+ZiZnGEqvCRUY6F3EeRFV4pYBM6m2kC2bbXJEBQwVoaWv25w9Wy 4SSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ooV+Td/4/ql4xRBTxPBB8vaBZb1tK1nCmIAWq1XMg1k=; b=Bn6Qz/OseNwYVlt+licMFh0uwIp4KluMSMxQOBByjTba+LspwV8NLMjmyrnP/7Quj7 b/zZG8tDd5w4M/1NKAF3ZQqBCSG8qrX3JdvqhZLtBZ1bVyi1l2cuWWfcgV3mjtR7H/P1 6PlNDNSMqrC4YhHgWm/v2VaywDy5yGPtVg0dxiHYquBgjnCf0SeTxNvdXSva6mtN3FGY W1YKfdHxQD9QwqYZxB4bwhOu7bebD9pxn2M2g1qagvGci+Y1D5c2wNinZrF/IurgCTVd tSH3mdjh1S76xnGBuiWWr4dILxwQVnsuOnsLxZfBoAfWcPZr8X7iKIZ1ePsmc1YeOyZl DLnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530EXpfkzUST6A8nvt5ZnMjAF67FTynnEaffOG6Hp1KkOj/Bre5N 93li084h9qNXvoFzMCz/U9jcve1gN6TUgfSKTPI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3n1psCVe1XUk9CDMGTrHcoJit7SKrJzLitvS7npgIZKnj1R48mTZLyWo210Yzr1Bovrqhbah2/ioZDqx8mIM=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f687:: with SMTP id p7mr16382872qvn.249.1597713351157; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200810172411.A13681E7CD8B@ary.local> <7e9326fc-ae27-d4bd-9f2b-9896da8320f1@dcrocker.net> <CAL0qLwacyBbJscEM_a4-nvugO0HBaSAdPqUPkfYYOOb++cOjQQ@mail.gmail.com> <5F396A77.3000109@isdg.net> <366e50ed8bda41cb879fa245e2d7c27a@bayviewphysicians.com> <CAJ4XoYev1WG8jWckSbkRmgxnJ1pM_CfM6-0Mhg9E6LraH1noyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZpGbr3Cv3_3tzERP8fx8u1fuMJ+ZS8W_=9jtqVAjgD8w@mail.gmail.com> <20ad2821-f705-d8d6-2921-a419e1bd0554@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20ad2821-f705-d8d6-2921-a419e1bd0554@gmail.com>
From: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 21:15:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ4XoYe0=2XsmJuhZ=eBNMfK2t85hQJumPaQMpyxVFMBAKfMGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bfabd705ad1ca0ff"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Wfxl7IXwSNdUs6BN64jP_7uY1pE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:54 -0000

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:09 PM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>  DKIM was a synthesis within the IETF of two things (DomainKeys and IIM)
> that started outside.  It underwent significant evolution in the IETF --
> not once, but twice.
>
> Actually, it wasn't.
>
> The constituent parts were separately proposed, during the same initial
> IETF discussions, and the IETF said to go away and come back after
> reconciliation.  That work was done by an ad hoc industry team and there
> was a complete spec and initial implementations before the IETF was again
> approached.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allman-dkim-base-00
>
> (and note that in the working group field on the title page, it says
> "pre-MASS"...)
>
> The work in the IETF was a refinement of a complete, integrated spec.
> d/
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorkingbbiw.net
>
> +1