Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Wed, 25 November 2020 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8453A1610 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:07:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q4R4GJtK5hDh for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C1713A15ED for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id 18so1556683pli.13 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:07:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=YlALgN9iz0fH/0JhFwGmBm1alFxx2ErY0cUmxLmeN8M=; b=Yidi41PidUEFDzQ0mOAQbntWjHnzn0lmaHnMi1Xk4c+bl+qG14eKz8JwtRUxAcN073 nxfInOjBSWDxnmOn5oHkmY1Hyy9If7mwB6wOeVK7XgNNt5y8BLNosQqHFwhjQ18jMw+L h4EjGzD3DQe7sBpyG69NVCXKvTVF8Eya1Y9eHRFRg9z3vZqYKoD/A6tvX7oiyAse7e4I UHc4tp3aOw9KLnceKpx3oPUfnbqMkB2m6SU6ye8qYBkImhD7sluSxhY/wOrxPNx7ffCK CFdXfjvhIII8euVmTC811OkoXoXTQ3kkc/RrYKfN3JCsvg2z4sDwWe1fVJRYZBVneBuE tjgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=YlALgN9iz0fH/0JhFwGmBm1alFxx2ErY0cUmxLmeN8M=; b=Tr9IUI2BK+26GzlDQDRI7BOCbIi3bdFDQ0EY7tYQIQx6kLOv5JJmSM5Hdyv3rp+gaU gu2TY9Lngy2Xf4uVHEbP98E6lej5q09/NdGlG5mSNH0FLuFAcG3da5kM7UItN8FWcaSA mBuxfwwRPk7Aup6OySlquTXulKees1yMbbemwf9UZKkwHuuqY/KBkuX9pebRt2KUxFWn t1pmYmdJaMiO6m0rgUSoLTNXRysIcBg7JwM8WLC/yWdOUVsKDcy3DszmbfxHLlQ6YGuR NCnmApTXM4TQasgRVnuzsZr8MSqKo0Kot70SJHZBw/PNoprW8YaBrT+vKIkV5xSyXIi7 R1uQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dizfLwAnn70Qrrsd+yTqhZLLNMw30Sc7w1kxfsVAbFs08cZi6 FMnm9IOVQuv51ilyQBPoOwh+7Ki8AOkHkw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2OQrfA1S2I1Ar2as6eBpbNRPqMPPzt5nkolK4U3+OWpoJEealmhTYwc3YOqLQf4LOFEhY+g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b7c2:b029:d9:c8f:e06b with SMTP id v2-20020a170902b7c2b02900d90c8fe06bmr4313821plz.29.1606331262378; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:07:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-37-5.volcanocom.com. [107.182.37.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fh22sm4000806pjb.45.2020.11.25.11.07.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:07:41 -0800 (PST)
To: Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20201124020453.AFDC027CE5C8@ary.qy> <cd855b53-d9bd-3412-3bd5-dc4b7720dc5c@mtcc.com> <CABa8R6s0bfs87Fu9eOq_R3WH1pngauVXrw3RSPe9iWWCtf3AmQ@mail.gmail.com> <c954eadd-5c85-c0d9-2168-8a42de506b72@mtcc.com> <CAH48Zfx25_o+-j0=mEA6ib=2aKPqBDihA4rt0c9_vE+570Q+TQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <045b64e2-cd61-06a1-07bc-5b8cfd231553@mtcc.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:07:40 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH48Zfx25_o+-j0=mEA6ib=2aKPqBDihA4rt0c9_vE+570Q+TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/WqvgooeaeiLkR88J1u9iqCXcRGU>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:07:49 -0000

On 11/24/20 7:27 PM, Douglas Foster wrote:
>
>
> In my opinion, ARC does leave a lot of unanswered questions about how 
> you use the data that ARC provides.   Again, the big organizations 
> have the brain power at their disposal to figure that out for 
> themselves, later.
>

They've had that data for over a decade from what I can tell. The exact 
same data that ARC provides, but perhaps a little hard to tease apart in 
some edge cases.

Mike