Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-02.txt

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Wed, 17 April 2019 13:21 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58BE12034A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=rByVhDy1; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=OqshDUGj
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JrgfEfdKYYus for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5B4F12008D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E0A9F807EE for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:21:25 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1555507285; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=Fb1Q7ZpwVqKSbUMOuU25I1rxtU62YrGZXOGhNnsqkqU=; b=rByVhDy13KQ887CY9CkfDH8J+QWXU3wTKxVGTMWtDWMnWD+2gDppNrB2 KZ46kjorb6gZjtKz89K6FdZdglVDDA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1555507285; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=Fb1Q7ZpwVqKSbUMOuU25I1rxtU62YrGZXOGhNnsqkqU=; b=OqshDUGjLDUrYXJ82YiCH8tWQErBuZkwaCYEhiMLZtWAXlVBqLTtJx6Z XPFRb3CTc+hDoBR/owgKWJ+9V8j+NYDj0KVQTNhrgPMs0/GddNWmW0YrCz 9fQalmh9qOFzVHDfbRz6GUYBdFDFP7F19ZUZiB2k+nqbaFkiH2CqRY/Du4 SBQSA4AWTBY1/aErR8+k8pPBdJgWRu3wmH0fUKz+QL3M6nVS0H9lw5hyv1 Jjj7Lpade+4lYPpKG8MxVxU+rNCG0orgbsPG3Tqclth3+A38gIY00v25JQ tce05m5cxENujWPxtTmMHWsis5991Q0fW2Z+1/7Rt3wwx0eT2IY/Pg==
Received: from kitterma-e6430.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F282F8008C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:21:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:21:23 -0400
Message-ID: <9099331.8T8SFv4asT@kitterma-e6430>
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-168-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <2706940.jsilLbKzHY@kitterma-e6430>
References: <155484752849.19715.13998301912703613498@ietfa.amsl.com> <2706940.jsilLbKzHY@kitterma-e6430>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/WuMmuocxfJr_S--zkPNSKBBZu3I>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:21:28 -0000

On Tuesday, April 09, 2019 06:09:30 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 09, 2019 03:05:28 PM internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message
> > Authentication, Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF.
> > 
> >         Title           : DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication,
> > 
> > Reporting, and Conformance) Extension For PSDs (Public Suffix Domains)
> > Author          : Scott Kitterman
> > 
> > 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-02.txt
> > 	Pages           : 10
> > 	Date            : 2019-04-09
> 
> I've attempted to do a few things with this draft update:
...
> 3.  Added an appendix to describe the registry approach to mitigating the
> data leakage privacy issue.
...

I've gone ahead and implemented addition of both PSD DMARC at checking the 
registry described in Appendix B to see if it's an appropriate PSD.  It's less 
than 20 lines of code in Python for both.  This confirms (for me anyway), my 
thought that this is not a complex DMARC extension to implement.

Scott K