Re: [dmarc-ietf] What happens for org and PSD lookups when you are already above the PSL boundary?

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Fri, 19 April 2019 16:12 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1qEbPGed+abDH8Ps06+4L=hQn+9QrbZc9EDsWmoQHWVsg@mail.gmail.com> <1897481.12dR8pik7S@kitterma-e6430>
In-Reply-To: <1897481.12dR8pik7S@kitterma-e6430>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:11:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1o4nAZ1uwLq+pTTZQ6ew3Mp2Yj6BrNnZfGDTPna2xs5Cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d1e0860586e46113"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/WyLp693aLIyM0NQJv1ChGiA9hto>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] What happens for org and PSD lookups when you are already above the PSL boundary?
Precedence: list

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 8:44 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

>
> I took a look at the non-comment content of the public portion of the PSL
> to
> get an idea of the scope of this problem.  Here's the distribution of
> lengths
> of public suffixes:
>
> one: 3077
> two: 3821
> three: 1986
> four: 3
>
> None longer than that, unless I screwed up my script.
>

While it may have changed since the days of DBOUND, I recall that there was
at least one hierarchy which had a public --> private --> public -->
private double transition which could make for longer names.

--Kurt

[dmarc-ietf] What happens for org and PSD lookups… Kurt Andersen
Re: [dmarc-ietf] What happens for org and PSD loo… Scott Kitterman
Re: [dmarc-ietf] What happens for org and PSD loo… Kurt Andersen (b)
Re: [dmarc-ietf] What happens for org and PSD loo… Scott Kitterman
Re: [dmarc-ietf] What happens for org and PSD loo… John Levine
Re: [dmarc-ietf] What happens for org and PSD loo… Scott Kitterman