IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion

Gren Elliot <gelliot@mimecast.com> Tue, 17 November 2020 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <gelliot@mimecast.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4CF3A0D68 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:28:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mimecast.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fy8A9mm_p278 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:28:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com (service-alpha-uk-a.mimecast.com [195.130.217.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4072E3A0997 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:28:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mimecast.com; s=20130419; t=1605605316; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PUyiOQlX1MSeYG+2a4VHQrwtu5HUx2dhKkF8i+Uic1A=; b=LlpVLZ+VAHoM22FavKVd1GOpc62TLfDkz4pfpGQXQ5q4UuvA9qffKhzvU3ecXEMgh6DvEB wXJcIjxtUa3GWEF869p7NVfpdtdITjzFKTRHY7DMEMx1X5q99XAVceWT/ng2OJ74HHOHpC Bq6OHcx5SGdPtXqlTwEwBrzIzRASYHs=
Received: from mail.mimecast.com (45.91.17.200 [45.91.17.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-sl-a-Cj6j-JgZNmmSasS5nIM0UQ-1; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:28:34 +0000
X-MC-Unique: Cj6j-JgZNmmSasS5nIM0UQ-1
Received: from LHC-IT-EML-P01.mcsltd.internal (172.17.26.211) by LHC-IT-EML-P03.mcsltd.internal (172.17.26.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2044.4; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:28:31 +0000
Received: from LHC-IT-EML-P01.mcsltd.internal ([fe80::b9f5:2f16:6fee:613d]) by LHC-IT-EML-P01.mcsltd.internal ([fe80::b9f5:2f16:6fee:613d%9]) with mapi id 15.01.2044.007; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:28:31 +0000
From: Gren Elliot <gelliot@mimecast.com>
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion
Thread-Index: AQHWvMQD0AmilQ1cfUGZ8lo+YGfujg==
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:28:31 +0000
Message-ID: <4BA72AFF-4058-4F8C-93B9-A5084E634779@contoso.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.16.26.8]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=C1A1 smtp.mailfrom=gelliot@mimecast.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 1
X-Mimecast-Originator: mimecast.com
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <53A40C2F199A674796697350EBF5B5ED@mimecast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/X49uFwvX-UFK0hLyk5e1mMK8DFo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:28:40 -0000

> If the meeting were to be held, who (besides Jim) was planning to attend?

I am - admittedly because I thought this would be a good chance to learn more about DMARC.
Would this not be a good chance to potentially increase interest?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email