IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs p=quarantine

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Sun, 20 December 2020 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BFA3A1204 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:07:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sBzUtzqm2zZj for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:07:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 284B53A11FF for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:07:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id v29so5157185pgk.12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:07:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=gZ6s2HZ21jql/AHIjyhCYaAZh9CKxIxdC3f+GnOTgzI=; b=K/Zbn8x8dMKt+zFUMzXn7qwW1rsJfPHpozZAJkzuQEna0HNoj4eeRAWni+e1LUrzDV qimLnULNlItCWEKdX8dEtaBx6qdkGzR1bjGx1MwovXy32iOHI/shAKbsFUTQmwVegt0U v1hDHuXAYBCzw/Ng88MFV3gbdokHHlNcMAnAVzoBqcbVnSBwTQmNjOWdJje9rjFdd37T n0y7SVxeSUBCLc7XvsbpSdIoRc3wgX7XDnUwm4esbHJ8QDT5qo4sVM0Klp7HDIOJ06z5 Va3z59dP6Yg/Kn5v4gCCSyfl250S89nsLP/+nE0NcjvowJdI5zPfGrrIat/VkF+co8r6 lGzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=gZ6s2HZ21jql/AHIjyhCYaAZh9CKxIxdC3f+GnOTgzI=; b=tf0kpy7ShIEFJdLTtb+m61l1UJqozSUplNSOZaMOOsn/ugVy4P1j5hG5Wh74ab62z+ Uwp8+VDSExmTnPZeKKD2RcLDZv0BGP1cwNK+KE03UW33nTr6rJ2uBg14SnpDCuxlrwtD tllcKEHyJqr/YOVLVobmK4QfriVrVaO06LScH+ymdtF0D7Wwo344Ks1OOqOJDHP0Sd2N u37VTb7/ysjUW/SofY1yQLQ/zx8Ag3s9H8a51zG8DvmzPro0La4ULrJAzKFQffyb0o7d 8MHFkH3fa0rFoubuwp6HT5aIDP/xt3SJ4Xn9sA2/Yx0EdVl2yVY42ZPAwgW5NdUH5yYz Zmzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531zJlVcXq5JYhPEndyh8W5hcsZ4MwtLlo746ER/FjJg2b+k4xdU l393CbAA08jVHL7dqzl4zC1u12LSsX1jzw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXjHA5aU3P7tmrGKrHJI0UBORwcuevkUyw71wBZo0usrRQz9Ya3bKN9i2XZ6OAj6jpP8jdCg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:ea01:: with SMTP id c1mr12665262pgi.138.1608502054112; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:07:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan ([107.182.37.0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t8sm2683197pgl.70.2020.12.20.14.07.32 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:07:33 -0800 (PST)
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <1e61f7c4-c6d2-5dab-dfc7-f1fd740e1d0d@tana.it> <20201219194954.BF87E2ADF1FB@ary.qy> <CAJ4XoYfx=qRyARbcf7m8T6+_2hJKifgAoBXBdfmqGucanrUJfw@mail.gmail.com> <9b7cc1c9-e031-4ef8-8d92-2c16cc4fa073@tana.it> <dd6c5588-8e84-5f90-931-51b4dd4c27cc@taugh.com> <ceaf2e324f8cf042b1b31621c79d5d59@junc.eu>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <a8218ce4-cd73-dec4-44a0-b77eb0546a14@mtcc.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:07:31 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ceaf2e324f8cf042b1b31621c79d5d59@junc.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/XM7FN4y9Hh7RSRbqs8PZeU13T90>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs p=quarantine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 22:07:36 -0000

On 12/20/20 2:01 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> hopefully maillists stops dkim signing, its the incorrect place to 
> solve breaking dkim


Sorry, ARC is warmed over DKIM, and an experiment. DKIM is a full 
internet standard and expressly intended for lists, etc to resign if 
they broke the original DKIM signature. We have always had the ability 
to do reputation checks regardless of ARC. I'm not sure when this wg 
lost sight of that.

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email