IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-11.txt

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Tue, 02 May 2023 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45246C15C501 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2023 07:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=tana.it header.b="7/EXkkkX"; dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.b="By6txvch"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WlBseBQWZStr for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2023 07:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [94.198.96.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EFE9C159A1D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 May 2023 07:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=epsilon; t=1683037657; bh=ccgrVitHifYRxF0CZfh/0sQ43N1kW5paHUyqpMq817M=; h=Author:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=7/EXkkkXSX3D7skYROH78933U1eCFMfmTSe9xOAOqEuJ+6OQK/IvXYZ+brsbL2oDU QZssT4Qx1o66IrnsWKSCQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1683037657; bh=ccgrVitHifYRxF0CZfh/0sQ43N1kW5paHUyqpMq817M=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=By6txvchly5iyv6A9n9Ky/8bGzkpNlupLzd790p3M6+ZwvBGev09Jsr6sRNgOyuyV E34RKtIsVtt4i7d0DWP+bd8ACwU4EuEZjXyzNF5gE9xkVOcY7BIzLc9A5AwIwEmws6 R1shxnvIEbYH/j6DQS+yDPP88+lbl3oJFt2qtsr+s9v5U7cp57KlW+rs9eB5T
Original-Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-11.txt
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [192.168.1.108] (host-95-244-43-41.retail.telecomitalia.it [95.244.43.41]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC0E2.0000000064511DD9.00005D9B; Tue, 02 May 2023 16:27:37 +0200
Message-ID: <9eb72423-fb4f-2f59-4d42-6b81c55921d4@tana.it>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 16:27:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <168303245438.44950.5510476786621801175@ietfa.amsl.com> <2029418.kFlsxoCR6A@zini-1880> <MN2PR11MB4351616A4D3BE89E13D1DF7CF76F9@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4351616A4D3BE89E13D1DF7CF76F9@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/XnQZ9dGrjRu_yNrbXyAlH5hajRo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-11.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 14:27:47 -0000

On Tue 02/May/2023 15:17:09 +0200 Brotman, Alex wrote:
> Otherwise, whitespace changes.


The effect on ABNFs is horrible.  We have

    dmarc-subject = %x52.65.70.6f.72.74 1*FWS ; "Report"
    %x44.6f.6d.61.69.6e.3a 1*FWS ; "Domain:" domain-name 1*FWS ; from RFC
    6376 %x53.75.62.6d.69.74.74.65.72.3a ; "Submitter:" 1*FWS domain-name
    1*FWS %x52.65.70.6f.72.74.2d.49.44.3a ; "Report-ID:" ridtxt ; defined
    below

instead of

  dmarc-subject = %s"Report" 1*FWS %s"Domain:" 1*FWS
                  domain-name 1*FWS               ; policy domain
                  %s"Submitter:" 1*FWS
                  domain-name 1*FWS               ; report generator
                  [ %s"Report-ID:" 1*FWS ridtxt ] ; defined below


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email