Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601

Damian Lukowski <rfc@arcsin.de> Tue, 31 March 2020 06:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc@arcsin.de>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703B03A1C17 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arcsin.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cFwnyCdkI6og for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scalar.arcsin.de (scalar.arcsin.de [185.162.250.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A46433A1BFD for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=arcsin.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:date:date:message-id:from :from:references:subject:subject:x-amavis-category; s=dkim01; t= 1585635746; x=1587450147; bh=UZl6X2/1Pztyzl7x3j/5AWGbWo/K4Gol6Sg WA6YXxEo=; b=gNjJxALZOSC0QUih6NC5Z3fOghO72GHi+8busgLk2WXRi4d77cg bwxKY/ozfOhzDlfwEfYr7LA8La4MWn5ZtS3wdPt3141e7HGcxVaA02+m+ClWo6dT GES3SXqRJSfHuvBORMKy+0NscAKoHR5zvWo+es+bFT+rtwjOq3RwmMRA=
X-Amavis-Category: scalar.arcsin.de; category=CleanTag
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <CABa8R6tTPAtEyPRSGbWKafZVZ4u8v8sN1VpTpMLQCia2_+5zRg@mail.gmail.com> <20200330212312.341EB16CFEA5@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwZ5c29gNG97gkGBsKW9mauKey+ftSNgqF51Mx=ZV0ABpw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Damian Lukowski <rfc@arcsin.de>
Message-ID: <230d0260-c254-99d3-0995-1ab05c326949@arcsin.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:23:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZ5c29gNG97gkGBsKW9mauKey+ftSNgqF51Mx=ZV0ABpw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Xu5j1nD1I7OEVclolJbNzc02wRQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 06:22:34 -0000

> The intent was indeed to make the authserv-id either a plain old ASCII
> domain name or an A-label which doesn't need quoting.  I missed that RFC
> 6532 didn't update "value", unfortunately.

I don't understand. If the intent is to have an old ASCII domain, or
A-labels (still ASCII), then why is it relevant that "value" has not
been updated to include real UTF-8?

Shall authserv-id contain UTF8-non-ascii or not?

Damian