Re: [dmarc-ietf] Post-IESG Review edits to RFC7601bis

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Tue, 22 January 2019 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BDA1310E4 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:39:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YKMkGDP8vpVZ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:39:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07F1613101B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:39:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id k2so20259052iog.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:39:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=v8/xq9WdP7kTG7nG2or4FcT6P4qoH2YXCYvGcQLE558=; b=VcamfSIjymn/IJegDeDfsAX/Pi1F8KHi0wh7VsssM2b19vYlXG1GDNdk6p8XW29WrD wI7ktoRNcRCORoeyW8NHH7BsdGOg6i8meAyD+EgbdSznj7YbxYT2BnB10IP2giHhU5Dn Uf0kJODP5+1L2bMJOqDEMylXN5qC1p0DIGQks=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v8/xq9WdP7kTG7nG2or4FcT6P4qoH2YXCYvGcQLE558=; b=hC+DS6CBUzmgEszslxa1wLme7JPA449zfzlblrvWXsQ+WroJJ4APShFldDK3Li0z/s Cw4Qw8SE/+c7oL0xsL7XGJh1GDXQfCj5izuxn8alP+ltI2Nm9bj6bhv7YUrFDHqrjgQa 5EsBFsF0Hh/9IncWbtYFgjfbIIyv9X7QM5ySQjaCpI+03cx0bc80dUa5+Mpz7MWKsx6x 0H1MOQpCl95y0+bfcxf8KHHOc6O0XSCC1WKvW9jo0XzIcsNBUGMuZflqIi+yz7GubaQJ 1iScWlWKxdHZYxwEJO0PcMB0gPMZgqy+4IX1ZATEwrhUkearUIbrmaw9NfKhspPHB61z EOcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukepbaH1ndoQ2C9i6o9xrKGY7oe44STO8qYEtySCiV/snmwhl4+x A/5Ti9QtizGJKFH8KRVGhJnoKgjiFyOXLjwMVWg9RQFUm0E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5jIBMUF+s7uf7f0gLPryXSEgFPbpsCZmMLAX0Wf6ihu8wi6Snfpo7GP15HDiPFgf7p6hcjUH9N0rV8KaCslLw=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8597:: with SMTP id f23mr21251900ioj.238.1548189580151; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:39:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwZdRym=kj9qD1f8d9ShNL3o09f+gGbyc2Q-1F1HtsMpYQ@mail.gmail.com> <B9E281E0-D50B-4D34-A392-76F7FE2E82B8@kitterman.com>
In-Reply-To: <B9E281E0-D50B-4D34-A392-76F7FE2E82B8@kitterman.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:39:28 -1000
Message-ID: <CABuGu1oNQg1dCRK79mNMRenQjjPEjxi+C2wEq2DarLvFMki4Sw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f85d6c058011f9b3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Y8P76QMZCEFbrzc0IfjeveyRadI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Post-IESG Review edits to RFC7601bis
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:39:43 -0000

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:09 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

>
> According to the rules of the registry (as described in RFC 7601), a
> designated expert can change entries to deprecated without a specification.
>
> No need to tie this to 7601bis.  Just ask IANA to make the changes (since
> you're the primary designated expert).
>

It's not so much a matter of tying it to 7601bis - there's just one or two
sentences in the IANA considerations to make it happen. It's more a matter
of cleaning out the obsolete sections of 7601 rather than carrying forward
verbiage about obsolete protocols.

--Kurt