Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC2 & SPF Dependency Removal

From: Alessandro Vesely <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 14:21:42 +0200

On Tue 13/Jun/2023 23:33:50 +0200 Tero Kivinen wrote:
> [...]
>
> As you can see 85.75% of incoming email was already signed by DKIM,
> and 86.5% of emails had SPF records that passed. So they both have
> about same amount if usage coming in to our servers.

What are those 0.75%, some 30k SPF - DKIM messages?  Are there cases of DKIM 
random failure salvaged by SPF?

> 	0.19%	7506	none,pass
> 	0.15%	5910	pass,none

How do you order DKIM signatures?

Thanks for the data

Best
Ale
--