IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt

Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Tue, 19 April 2022 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7401B3A0CA3 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UfEp91W_TzY1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F6E43A0CC7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id b68so8830325qkc.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NJ6/7QRwbPw+kwsKT7u3sHGIj1uT2Url3FJqyHihLWY=; b=KNs20IPt98fxvmAPukFmbj/lyxT/g43NdAmJdWZwUmnRGu2uP3jjeXIhCPswzOfpiA PbcF4xF39dGVDD32iZL+CRbb/7ikXcFtTkLc5WptN6nMeonDCBIW2avq3RU9qqmo+ZBb VDQeT59QREtls5ESl6U7YqEQGAtpL+b49JAKZLc1a7lQKwtJPkHWZlsMHH7P9aH1rH9m NR0xYBkK/VIkJd+oCfVMgKxZ8e+KWNGa5+JI9m2ghrtDKAu3fxsrvvtC+FTyTXxsJjnT 3qo/26lg8gGqRg0KlDKvj1j2dLVbISK9Zc7yEcdf3E7VJNw0+G/GaCulL4Jm1KD+hIR0 xShQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=NJ6/7QRwbPw+kwsKT7u3sHGIj1uT2Url3FJqyHihLWY=; b=gPPFjMNYsHVinRtRtVQ4Ri/S+u7QtfaZnPGkmGwM4JMNPxoidEePCvRTx9myIRMcVJ wKzH9Jg18ed+YJz9WK9f4XsXWEZrNx+isG94KtE/k3JphI3WSq4cZ/z1PVkqpplkbhTY 9XeQ1ySLvo3v2Z3VZz9wbd/WUV+q4vH06AfzJlQW6K1dqtLjAPHscC2Ly4u77swHReMU w5jKtSetCIAvXuNzmnWGgwRr0SDpeneegmCTQiXZaeRXJHbiOQbTo4yuBj3iXYPU/TTL jHGZdmfzFqJxLHQx/pKgcoAWbHdMxLrdSMVhgGrNykAOWvKmeVQ5yBYsnpKH1M5Cxrfo /83g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5317HziWs3Bupl2oTio7pW26ZU1gLUzMaYLUJz59LvVcGQL1J/G5 DEaiFspCyk11WkoQXTpS0bc9ZatYs40vFSNv9zDxRmGC43Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyclvX8XreWz/8nxDSWQZ6bswIyl3TxqraUIQ7016zAtyMk7V2XE+qHjs/Y0o+HMSiAtMJQUHiE0fa4MNWgLUg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:c55:b0:67e:125b:38ea with SMTP id u21-20020a05620a0c5500b0067e125b38eamr9553175qki.396.1650379519587; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164925666278.4445.13789431014958416691@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKFywT++HQxRfE+bO5Eoj5mJQoSctJroiMJz3rY_UHVa04bQXg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKFywT++HQxRfE+bO5Eoj5mJQoSctJroiMJz3rY_UHVa04bQXg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:45:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHej_8kk2RpGmySVaw7-gd3xD4z4KC-ptWLcqv9w3NAOO2NLJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000028b5105dd02ed69"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/YOuo1MdubfCz0pIjA34-cpnn38M>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 14:45:35 -0000

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 3:48 AM Robert <aradesh@gmail.com> wrote:

> There's a typo in Section 4.5 Flow Diagram:
>
>    Put simply, when a message reaches a DMARC-aware rMTA, a DNS query
>    will be initiated to determine if a DMARC policy exists that applies
>    to the author domain.  If a policy is found, the rMTA will use the
>    results of SPF and DKIM verification checks to determine the ultimate
>    DMARC authentication status.  The DMARC status can then factor into
>    the message handling decision made by the recipient's mail sytsem.
>
> "sytsem" should be "system".
>
>
Thank you. It will be corrected when the next rev is released at some point
in the near future.
-- 

*Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email