Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Mon, 07 December 2020 22:20 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DA93A0B9C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:20:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GYkCnpeRJu7O for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:20:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F3443A0B92 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:20:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id x15so13779805ilq.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:20:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=EOXscp35qB4bhNvfJY9bvTkCKpchv60eipLW2EvSrjQ=; b=cy+xv6cD6+8vvIFO6P2mqdrj82Xucu92NydO0ZYCggH+SGdPTdLZUmyz/ieiwSPunh jU76WMBuC+3f7W98jRB9tuGu5oHEt5u0VRysSJUr4ipBUxVlC1WemS7NxTy6DfkaPL3X nmlSoE1oCwwI9tEpm9KAfRhHb059IEkWu87C8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=EOXscp35qB4bhNvfJY9bvTkCKpchv60eipLW2EvSrjQ=; b=g4FkGC9iqat9mU8z+q3rsctPrneDLWtQNBxj2hSyjh7qMpdNkfvofDOarqFGDCFwyt GxoyIUnLA0xzlUI4Ouaw3B3KMYKCelMBp2+NYgGybRIUDtFS9ius4IzQq1Aeoqf9Sn7C pEH/9mFiSBl3CiEawVM2CEveQS0rp1prp7XFdw1Wsu8VJG9LwbE3qHTpQ+f/kyLNqT9F //R2DII06jNj6Wg/QFfgiXSJPohXRmCdRZLNYnjVnJIGVe6fvLiOBV53dmrrsHlOmlqL r5wcapkPKTQTrryS3RncB+I3VinfRboLX+Fer7lep5s8RdDgJ8Llj42GXUhRjvx8+c8f DRzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533px6v/3J3QMlkEHD8Li+Q5Big72XuMdzfsp/VfNq84p4tJwDZd lhnDfQi+K02mOwbT1HivgUSNUrJocgi3eH24DK+PIT8M+26LEw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzY9YAUTqlHIfFlwNANpfGJ2E7AjmaushRXsMaiRLKu6SbjrjApIsXP63ngQiZlY51zSqVbViOOtmOc7YTIM0c=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:9509:: with SMTP id y9mr23493216ilh.103.1607379612296; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:20:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201205231059.2BA23290EDCD@ary.qy> <b437a23a-7e7e-f70d-04dc-49810d002c43@mtcc.com> <b6950472-599b-d0a7-c0d1-82db099fb99b@gmail.com> <7ae42764-176d-11a8-e084-b10b6f676944@mtcc.com> <cb526017-c198-44f1-7282-986e5a810d6a@gmail.com> <8142f18c-ac79-1f94-97d1-2704f0b4ceb6@mtcc.com> <CAH48ZfwHKoVZn9RdhBh-xU=he8=smB59R5EF1TYJ_0upEDHn2A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH48ZfwHKoVZn9RdhBh-xU=he8=smB59R5EF1TYJ_0upEDHn2A@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:19:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1on+EzAgah1dF+30VSs5T6A51QOgsrsOq9AKezHD5e1wA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cf82f805b5e73a01"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Z4wXOyscbz1VXdbMDyba26PtOao>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs reject
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 22:20:15 -0000

On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 5:21 PM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> wrote:

> ...much of this is about AOL in particular, and the currently available
> information suggests that AOL is not on board with ARC.
>

I would point you to
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-22#section-12.2
(note that per normal IETF procedure, section 12 is removed in the
editorial conversion from an I-D to an RFC).

--Kurt