Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 05 November 2018 08:14 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32BE1274D0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:14:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xsrUiecBPdaZ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:14:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x12b.google.com (mail-it1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 279E91271FF for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:14:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id t190-v6so5743894itb.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 00:14:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4E3zEKsh/WZlqAKipR47dSIfI1AJILU6NdeAdt7shf0=; b=QAAjSRmr5aTs35xom/RuoCNeKFYGcYiXz/ygtbpIQjU3sMFgWZXBHQ4Tw21ep+9JVS M9Vl4IB8Dp2Udie9xpRAaAwsTaZeNMLhq+ioVXhQwsu4elreQijbzgarfhoOnYS9fDkT rjlkslGuXGes5u/T8iDu/Kl24SINQiOrRheUKH7Swy+sE+swKCF7ZI+RsQjAyoKB4blu IwCiaRwvTo2ZeThJFcHlobkOYey3Ho+a6qpwE7Hi6yiTIbhKju1D5DcMS5DQlRlvBpPk VeReXaov/k4s/Hve28Y7WS9oZpcAp6WeAAc365Sk5DPcp58kpb6W0zPnFwRX8+2Otnq3 5Agg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4E3zEKsh/WZlqAKipR47dSIfI1AJILU6NdeAdt7shf0=; b=CDDXINFkUO2qLsmzFixcnlPSfkngD3gaCvPnu80eDw7cYJVQ0B5GJk+fFJfRGiikBU MOduWhmm783TCw16jejmNN8xejCkN4vjnbKtOch3zcs5z5lEDDyBNmdR5i9ekIp/YBkN EmJx7PZdYA6JNb1nYFiylBF0SEJX6mIvcQpln3EbZiEDRNxSYo34/jZgyzUB0kXyYqti k/YpNSZmbD2MlE5pVG2sklWp9ZDjxnzAKb6d9mxNsJpZCsX4M3jrGBS0tg7Mc6mzmalH utCBChe7rdY2hOrq6be8lHdqmAFZ0yw1NNr0BjAAz0nd8XLCnW/e9FwQZhSv6xue4ett 5n6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLzTnojBAF9tk8KAJilKr8K5Q1FdMm8Ddvgn7qhxeKBZgPQ2YJb t4YilS/Hw8UOK8G5jOKP8Tm2eUn/WGHHaSzpxE4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5ckIT4FEJ3B5iqj2HmZMSGXT/Hz+U0TqPD1DSAPV0InEiXOA98cPOkEnA5iGcs+4JY+JS7aGkPSu66nc6fHxh4=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:6882:: with SMTP id v124-v6mr5872559itb.124.1541405683433; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 00:14:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCQmV5agORght0XWr27kDD+OkaEZcKcaDtE8wLG0Yi-YA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYk9Vqtc9ATjmF4PR3TSD2miuBAg5KvkAJLkQ4V1zscog@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYk9Vqtc9ATjmF4PR3TSD2miuBAg5KvkAJLkQ4V1zscog@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 15:14:46 +0700
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+HPWAwpY=wSkdoUEcSuiKrXRoDczwzfPfPq9=quus3QTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, dmarc@ietf.org, Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000037440d0579e67aac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ZLKeot6IDgwxu0MQLo3B6JsEAIA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 08:14:47 -0000

No objection here

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:07 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> No objection.  I've already got opinions ready to go when it gets
> accepted.  :-)
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:23 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
> wrote:
>
>> > I'd like to recommend that we (DMARC-WG) accept
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kitterman-dmarc-psd-00
>> > into our work queue. It aligns with our charter already.
>>
>> I've seen three agreements and no objections, so here's an official
>> call for objections.  If there are none by 16 November, we will create
>> draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-00 as a new working group item.
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> dmarc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>