Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 27 October 2018 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B87C130D7A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 13:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=cfgwjf0v; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=n76eYSzA
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vly8uywX05Bu for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 13:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51F82130E0A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 13:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 15791 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2018 20:04:06 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=3da4.5bd4c4b6.k1810; bh=aedhNF3Yql1xgCfrT9ubqG91cCXYlifeCV3YIcRabIw=; b=cfgwjf0vobS03fzKWvRfPz+/aQz2U5/X1O3oWpHrCt8L8hq9RRvVy4vPRR6d517h48T/QKEQ4v4dWQBb9uH+fTC7REsFvzlfo7bdr5/XJFlVWYl0cNuyFZ+HBkTf78L76Q5ZaqLdnT/G9VnF6SNT9+cO9zYWdotg/eS28Yf/KAdr/kD0P4o27ENCoatYoDtWG2QqlYUTGBmw7i8KH6sapYq/zjEH9+iS/njpcKVLZlTOIzTcNe9ryKxGNnfrd7Q7
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=3da4.5bd4c4b6.k1810; bh=aedhNF3Yql1xgCfrT9ubqG91cCXYlifeCV3YIcRabIw=; b=n76eYSzAOCaRt3mTMEpK4u+2teVJXVuBowvOldTK02W9KA7UEEyLyNsxfKQI9GEXlZJJspspX02xSOexHCs9RgoKy5N9ag5c6/OwnS0E7Id+03xbVS1D75GaXJtoHAacvj5gI6Amy2+VN/u/TzerQ4M9ft+GUlBI5wjfqhJMhKjNnxHDdkAqwwPSD/vDXL2wohpx4y70Di+4YORvnwD8WrkqKBayxxMI2VRLJk4husVB4f4AFvQrQlQqc2ikCoWi
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 27 Oct 2018 20:04:06 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 09F7120072CE14; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:04:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 27 Oct 2018 16:04:05 -0400
Message-Id: <20181027200406.09F7120072CE14@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: kurta@drkurt.com
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ZPzFH11IBxc4VIYKue9z8h9HMBs>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 20:04:09 -0000

In article <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>I'd like to recommend that we (DMARC-WG) accept
>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kitterman-dmarc-psd-00 into our work
>queue. It aligns with our charter already.

OK with me.  I'd like a clearer explanation of what problem it solves,
but that should be fixable.