Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-02.txt

Hello folks,

Below you'll see the details relating to the most recent iteration of the aggregate reporting document.  I attempted to address as many tickets as I thought feasible.  I would probably suggest that the core of changes were relating to explaining more about the format, more properly defining the report format, and extensions.  There are a few other items that may need resolved, depending on feedback from these alterations.  Thank you for your feedback, and happy reading!

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting/
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-02.txt

--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dmarc <dmarc-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 2:21 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
> Subject: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-02.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication,
> Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : DMARC Aggregate Reporting
>         Author          : Alex Brotman
> Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-02.txt
> Pages           : 23
> Date            : 2021-04-23
>
> Abstract:
>    DMARC allows for domain holders to request aggregate reports from
>    receivers.  This report is an XML document, and contains extensible
>    elements that allow for other types of data to be specified later.
>    The aggregate reports can be submitted to the domain holder's
>    specified destination as supported by the receiver.
>
>    This document (along with others) obsoletes RFC7489.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-
> aggregate-
> reporting/__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!XYGoVpJyLMjJvBfT6HfI7rp_pBZainnzqhXO4GaZaW
> gQDB55FiuC8137pI2qMKu6L5N_$
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-
> aggregate-reporting-
> 02__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!XYGoVpJyLMjJvBfT6HfI7rp_pBZainnzqhXO4GaZaWgQDB55
> FiuC8137pI2qMGEpytDa$
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-
> dmarc-aggregate-reporting-
> 02__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!XYGoVpJyLMjJvBfT6HfI7rp_pBZainnzqhXO4GaZaWgQDB55
> FiuC8137pI2qMMR-T_gY$
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-
> dmarc-aggregate-reporting-
> 02__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!XYGoVpJyLMjJvBfT6HfI7rp_pBZainnzqhXO4GaZaWgQDB55
> FiuC8137pI2qMJZqLFqL$
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-
> drafts/__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!XYGoVpJyLMjJvBfT6HfI7rp_pBZainnzqhXO4GaZaWgQD
> B55FiuC8137pI2qMJhtlMe4$
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc__;!
> !CQl3mcHX2A!XYGoVpJyLMjJvBfT6HfI7rp_pBZainnzqhXO4GaZaWgQDB55FiuC81
> 37pI2qMMU63FiT$