[dmarc-ietf] Post-IESG Review edits to RFC7601bis

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 22 January 2019 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BA9130F3A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:53:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w1ctffQebg5Y for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 945AC130EE1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:53:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id e26so18899435lfc.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:53:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aQn7atEnpdp+pEmIIlvDuJePpX6eNFhdZD9nw8O1Heo=; b=HltgDu/zln/lk65xB1P50hyAozWglqldlBCpp+5CqnUwOoRrpojLZM+zEdg1hz3XZk ewQDJIhWl4ftamYV4YI+3idNv68TQ4FmmDBDo3IXfw+gScQnc5MvVPp4QpzhdyTrNVnv HJrG4SDBqG+RF0sgFouLlDnAGKbU0CbMfxNjWoRx4CyyO/UsIIa4FCu887ImVl1A26dt i0MRzqOhBEQYkINbgU5sY8IbydgLRfXyerKlM+9pb8BSFLSBkBXrbP39jwM5/AddybGy n6GzAU18PyKJZrDZwYlFzWwI4TWWKULkQaLnyBkUHtKg5OPhMzAL10fYCRrz6/+mljMN ni8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aQn7atEnpdp+pEmIIlvDuJePpX6eNFhdZD9nw8O1Heo=; b=kY3yqQ7nZNG8POGZks2chbwlaxuYXkbuUIiXsQ/3p18GGqQP33hpw+ZuhDYVG+2LNE iCVk3gmauyu6CntCDpB1jNlG5aeD9VpE8W3HLgbvQyto5/UJW3WJ90wq1c5xQLI1/jpn PSZJ4I3K2NjMsF4HAPQOp5I+YlocaGO5wjD5hP/E4v7KTcN8xFXI/yZwzRBSO926ENHm MmcAJoQnQF92CFlglR9CDMx3CPI+10OeRT4C0U3nXzwABcFS6U4z4VLwGmlDr4pJEbgH QlGIV3ooEXcD24V6BvJAXEFEqvfzgy6f45rZt7RClDfHdNZaydIaKOB+IUFebjPAKe2I n8mw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdhs/WL3Y+MmgE8obtLpwoiopAo8ZW/F26919XZpRNoGPd7CObe Z3NaSZ4J3LlJcH9HtsZfrP+UJZBPVU5tC343wYgEwA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4DCrfnZUJTv+/MMRvoxx28FH3msHwy+JpQ/u6/6r7GgT1i3o7/FE0TJjeXPVzDbb/3FdEqWr4mlpcrZnnSN1M=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:c203:: with SMTP id l3mr8708468lfc.113.1548183226148; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:53:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:53:33 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZdRym=kj9qD1f8d9ShNL3o09f+gGbyc2Q-1F1HtsMpYQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003dec9e0580107f47"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Zkk1693QCIy0czXkXLdBwKdiyK8>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Post-IESG Review edits to RFC7601bis
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:53:51 -0000

With the posting of -05, we expect the last DISCUSSes to clear (one already
has) and the document can proceed.

During DISCUSS discussions, it was pointed out that the ADSP, Sender ID,
and DomainKeys specifications bear "Historic" status, and thus they should
not be carried forward into the new version; they will continue to exist in
the Authentication-Results registries, but their status will be changed to
"deprecated" and their defining documents will be left at RFC7601, while
the others that are still current will remain "active" and their defining
documents will be updated to point to this new one.

As this wasn't expressly part of the Working Group Last Call, it's
appropriate that this be posted here and people be given a chance to
express their opinions on this last-minute change.  Thus, with the Chairs'
approval, I'll post this on Friday absent any sustained objection, and
Alexey can then send it off to the editors.

The proposed diff to -05 can be seen here:
http://www.blackops.org/~msk/diff.html

-MSK