[dmarc-ietf] PSL thoughts
Brandon Long <blong@google.com> Mon, 09 September 2019 22:15 UTC
Return-Path: <blong@google.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6420C12087C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A2bjiHf99mt8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92d.google.com (mail-ua1-x92d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A11BD12086B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92d.google.com with SMTP id n6so4885721uaq.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 15:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9nUCS7R3L0wUEo6bbcO4R9sklIgZPXJQsOz412nNAHk=; b=Z1vIZdVZkEriUJepCxMLBy1YEON+FvsM7svau8NlHVf0eD9pxhNBDn+ui8Q5JNWGwi h7lLjBwEOVQhvRK6K9VVFUbc+cpHYaAJQhLcl5y2GwEs4U2JXEuXTkRYhRog3k0tGLLG NDYEncyxF/DdbCme/Dx+4eervMa/V7ChhpAQU5IU47KjnGRFE6CT6TV8lnGbylXGFgVI z1B4nMJ88wFqzMLR8jEMhZIcmFAvHzXfg5QNKFDqYxE3Ury6iRPBKeF+zwhd3TydVnq2 Wnj1hkVXBTnSlUiaXSWENXzXS2nJ/oDZeaQDji10Kx2yw2QzT2dAhpbDhB9ufFljEhyn V+8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9nUCS7R3L0wUEo6bbcO4R9sklIgZPXJQsOz412nNAHk=; b=FbEqBu4v2ZV4ss/ShOhceQnvwxmAQf76ecNLEBMvV8EZUewaygRBYYg9HYJbnEOLF1 aaERVpyeFyfEm9YcygUC1k1/g4OzFYgq6iFmMOtHJrn8/YxRu2FjEBZFQpcg/ZW0oRvc xps8ExlHBkucLVEnrsvNjnM+SNxsU1OaDoKowrH3AobwTRrnyKtjlNd8RUCfCxvAtarR B62S/LVIFVypPeymnYrqfmyFqRSPwPM/Rd9DWKjoOCojcrFcOMra0MAir1OzJL2LNBIT NdCE8tPLMP7m2od84KZyMl1AHN8UWcwONPy2qa/Qm/p4BDjlfQ8/mJ6Ha0LqKzEQKax+ Wn8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWRRQQiowY+w1A/Av8gOofQGtE4hE8ep9d8QAwCZHaKobiSMRUq z3TufyxaGO3YTX+A9jVey0wBOQHpbbEFDzlT5eEDKx+h1w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyzWXgWMD/TgHtGhuXWJrYeiJTEgnoAqf7GAvOkAvbX784hk5SEjrnQSJrt/AIyp7HaD9/eniOemC4zAE8dQiA=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:270a:: with SMTP id s10mr11766322uao.66.1568067329862; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 15:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 15:15:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CABa8R6v3fgJhsq18QREhbOfzrLJVGoOvH9tMuRTrZa9wnYwUqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002e9315059226204f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ZtiZUKe-edWtv5XJyMzQE4FpwDo>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] PSL thoughts
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 22:15:37 -0000
Given that DMARC depends on PSL and the ongoing discussion about it in the PSD threads, I thought this doc would be of interest: https://github.com/sleevi/psl-problems/blob/master/README.md Given we're dealing with trying to close something that's default open, I'm not sure there's a great alternative solution, but it at least puts into perspective some of the web folk's thinking on the subject, since they maintain the PSL. Brandon
- [dmarc-ietf] PSL thoughts Brandon Long