Re: [dmarc-ietf] Decorum on the DMARC WG list and BCP 94

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Thu, 07 January 2021 04:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCFD3A0EB3; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 20:52:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.359
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w4Sek4PiLEzX; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 20:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9DA83A0E80; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 20:52:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id m6so3128511pfm.6; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 20:52:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=59UTueCuNkvD7kVj0OEGNs36lo5ncH7SvuCSG+PY100=; b=ic8mzXkcfZGWBo81ZqikMDZGCvAdGGAWFIYjmjwtSY6tn64aut0xYHZBwmdhcNjnGX 0ghRykYUYrzhzfA5SgDFJX1Vo7ffa2ubkOIitjjXFz/vV8Fp6oA16pD2PvG+b/M9XeAD e7wcjDXYig8YrvlDelaepGFe2F44tgvgEAJ9D2qXitYqmkxEHsDgEdq2qiynPc9/hCK0 +kWDh+I3+eHqseBP5bGXTfP//zw/wXuDFQac0BSA3S9Mwkyk5+NDx0vkgEngpgv8rzvX m1/7Pt8t5ivA199OzufvDdKwXQZaqQ0zkbjjlLc2MwAZ3zZb6/R68K/GUlTZRklt6kfN j43w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=59UTueCuNkvD7kVj0OEGNs36lo5ncH7SvuCSG+PY100=; b=uXOgYR+UL3GbmhJWfKiwdnIGnXLAGkYSVjAxCbUY+uyRivbDM6ab9qSb4OJa8a32mW s88yLJLVwvQVmh/gcOY2IH4KTTK5JEY6BqAqxum61S3ZRKQCGSDI0ddye6eTZObttbC9 mX4Qez0Nm0+zlKzRHGzOo7PFZTMxrGEJDrT2h9689U9t2AnYIu5EyYnDehpOIK5dHdxZ 1DMlv/A+P3BK/gJAG+f8k8lBTESg/mSzsTcngCG/vwn07Nz+Pk7Rpe1XJnDGgCMeeXa7 GrxfQzQjqdIf0aXfh6qzasIZ7yGszgr2EYXftEqWlJJNy6cBlDuY430WLoemXxHJsz6u DNSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532yENN6o/3Grvd+R3uuDVdnmIeIyjHWAsLyga3Qyfuu/dNvSMq2 uiYekoUCVeiSQy8HxAk/8vuOmWbFEWw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwq515wZLrdKntogKWBORTSXnx/xGr1GUXJxhm5I6I5V3fm3wo4HWGVdfVFCacccyXR3x151A==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5642:: with SMTP id g2mr26296pgm.434.1609995123120; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 20:52:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gm18sm544715pjb.55.2021.01.06.20.52.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Jan 2021 20:52:02 -0800 (PST)
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Seth Blank <seth=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, ART ADs <art-ads@ietf.org>, dmarc-chairs@ietf.org
References: <CAOZAAfPW6Oki-4Ebgk9yS1H-r19PBTqE8nDMTFjUKY38JKgrfQ@mail.gmail.com> <acf32e64-f1fa-25df-b677-2e279ffeb2cc@gmail.com> <CADyWQ+HQk2+o+YweayH5t3GHua79zUBB1=1VFr6XXLgPt6kO0g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d8dd3487-48b7-bd35-90fb-60c1d62eb39f@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 20:52:00 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+HQk2+o+YweayH5t3GHua79zUBB1=1VFr6XXLgPt6kO0g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8D922E9B2A46ECBECB57897F"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/_AhzKnv63NUn-7ZxaG6VmWQWTDs>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Decorum on the DMARC WG list and BCP 94
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 04:52:05 -0000

On 1/6/2021 8:47 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> You should have a pretty good idea based on these arguments over the 
> past few months to have a sense of how responses will be received. 
> Take a step back and take a second read.
>
> This goes for all. Folks have very specific views of how they think 
> mail should work


Tim,

This has nothing to do with differences in opinion.  It has to do with 
his persistent inability to conduct civil discourse in the face of 
disagreement.

Disagreement is fine.  Abuse is not.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org