IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC aggregate reports XML Schema inconsistencies

"Marc Bradshaw" <marc@marcbradshaw.net> Tue, 27 August 2019 04:17 UTC

Return-Path: <marc@marcbradshaw.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5C1120973 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.285
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.285 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=marcbradshaw.net header.b=js6GXQX5; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=kdVD8B0j
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SlWOGGX_i0jL for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDF01200CE for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA42682 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:17:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap38 ([10.202.2.88]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:17:17 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= marcbradshaw.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=/FDzzXE ASpPpIAZyGc6zZ03IiCfDdccizuiZ0KaTJcI=; b=js6GXQX5kXbtdsJLTMqbQdE L+AZcNxOdNPJsTH5QZBzbpRg9hX72pzC+oXse7TU7Dbxr7ygZ001QZmvvhRJGs3a NJXLs47VXwHW2RGtqJOVIw8bQzXYsbl7LVNIhuIrgzbCjR91jcuY//Z7qW3eiQCz PcrIgV35kW8eJfVnfQVsbtdVu8WzCKLb2U7DRK4XWraPLBy1u+2I7KZ1s6ha3xDM JywRBtr5CrpdxzdONN0nelg3xYJOdfyHhyPdZMxZYfnj+bM8lNlf+7T58E0wOCXJ 0IfyOSxT34tO5X8M0aFjlYVFZD9uLcDqJKpO9/FZaJq1jgJGb9mkcBpEkIa1Cug= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=/FDzzX EASpPpIAZyGc6zZ03IiCfDdccizuiZ0KaTJcI=; b=kdVD8B0jqtABkAJdBelfSs RtY0jyuZ0PBjGOYpSOokmLnxIFVbaAEdrKv0slQHe9fpc556QXlNgb0brFoBBY9Y IFFJTQZnQQmkLRsNtUz9HK8DIeUUcaihF9ETK/heWKM1yrDUNrsJJjvTZckV6P2G WFYLBN2UVgAG9N7dGPxr+AWa2YIEvzXfYGzRdnGxdwTbSTP0m/ONtA5wMPYXtWQQ 3myXhWp99tfqE/9IE2n86NJaVlhoexE1hV7xC7Q93yrUoKrywOsLfxo8RVcVjSLW wIVBmEbkAZWrglznDX/QMHeYeJXqsAuAXl8rvWC4Tq7REwmvpDbGHTK/jbE//qEw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:zK5kXUvy1Z57O7Uw-ZZvx3eZOan_hOO5FphbM2sWRL1JHAMhUCz_vg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudehhedgkeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne goufhushhpvggtthffohhmrghinhculdegledmnecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffu tgesrgdtreerreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrtgcuuehrrggushhhrgiffdcuoehmrg hrtgesmhgrrhgtsghrrggushhhrgifrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepsghithdrlhih pdhtfihithhtvghrrdgtohhmpdgumhgrrhgtrdhorhhgpdhivghtfhdrohhrghdpmhgrrh gtsghrrggushhhrgifrdhnvghtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmrghrtges mhgrrhgtsghrrggushhhrgifrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:zK5kXcWVvq2JT-_PN2XtBNhOMfm1RS9WC4BpuiV0l_MoNoAI5T82wA> <xmx:zK5kXXmDf38MK8q0Ozn8kvjQZBlcBQtdkqwRVsfKQKH5jjfuMQ3HDA> <xmx:zK5kXVa-32jRrIRyMPFoApoWzojvEfqWIjoc0WkgLU-stWqoMO5mIg> <xmx:za5kXQdiyj18FyaP1-C28W3IeRrvkUBzGz7tc6NNRHPc20wL_2I2yw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id B90414C000A6; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:17:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-139-g73fcb67-fmstable-20190826v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <bce844c3-a65a-44a2-bbbf-dc418b310e1c@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f751fe04-82a1-ccad-8ef6-da11ce775703@tana.it>
References: <008401d54784$f8300750$e89015f0$@leemankuiper.nl> <CABuGu1p3N+esAB=qz_1D1m6SWjEMP_JiKU1o0K6uLne-24qxRA@mail.gmail.com> <014c01d547b6$85c30c30$91492490$@leemankuiper.nl> <f751fe04-82a1-ccad-8ef6-da11ce775703@tana.it>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:16:56 +1000
From: Marc Bradshaw <marc@marcbradshaw.net>
To: DMARC IETF <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f3361a6f86704582a6b0f13819f701eb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/_SEQyNFCdvX5KJ4mne6FpFDlhsI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC aggregate reports XML Schema inconsistencies
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 04:17:20 -0000

These changes make sense to me.

On Sat, 24 Aug 2019, at 2:09 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I made some more adjustments, including the addition of a 1-record example
> report. By properly setting the attributes of the feedback element, the
> version can be parsed by generic xml tools and doesn't need to be written as an
> element.
> 
> I bumped the version to "http://dmarc.org/dmarc-xml/0.2". I think we all agree
> that some changes are necessary.
> 
> 
> Best
> Ale
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed 31/Jul/2019 17:42:12 +0200 Freddie Leeman wrote:
> > Thanks Kurt, I’ve made the adjustments to the document.
> > [...]
> > 
> > Van: Kurt Andersen (b) [mailto:kboth@drkurt.com] 
> > Verzonden: woensdag 31 juli 2019 17:00
> > [...]
> > 
> > Speaking from experience, it can be helpful to be able to do in-place comments/markup so I've posted http://bit.ly/dmarc-rpt-schema - please make any adjustments in "Suggest" mode or comments you feel appropriate. The invitation extends to all members of this group. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --Kurt Andersen 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
> 

--

 Marc Bradshaw
marcbradshaw.net | @marcbradshaw <https://twitter.com/marcbradshaw>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email