Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Sun, 06 December 2020 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E06A3A0DFF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 06:06:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XbcCw45qnLHy for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 06:06:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCCB93A0DF9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 06:06:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id bj5so5751761plb.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 06:06:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=mM++UV9noYmd/YaOigYcANUR05KZvS0XmjNvBREocDI=; b=lcJOJd+Y8g7wcvPkD8vDTGFmlQZmoy5ElWG1lCv3t+UWDeAi/6v1+cqFf55w20QNCg BncBEISERUDTTmFGm6b7ktNgIwVSAieUfiM7vmIbXdeXUVaxTCmabdjgBTWiLPH+/KNo 9dTYOy1xFK3Iq17vogKOg8VmRVxamdQhHlSBg1RsZvAMYGF9oEiV55LJfLYtW8+0Zi1J 338ZxeDRffKMhh5e2HgHSKjY7HZtHsl9iIZeB84zAJPyMjZo5IMMNSTEQR5ZtDyr9oGy U8m5pYor3TIL9kW1aW57qXp3ULiFh6oJbOU6f2WPcAXedc9snVPw+IZod2kEMgIAavoO 22yQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=mM++UV9noYmd/YaOigYcANUR05KZvS0XmjNvBREocDI=; b=IfvAUn/Gm8SZp+cmgTSkBhhU72SMlC0wDXr2Xo4wkfdBZN/T1QQYnq6B63GHJiABSl Al7ypirA2zhMDE71TOxKCiqF5YCSKusOpOLS6yr1L4nT+ZjwoR9CSSP0uYhtzihzxdo+ 5rKWX7MYcE51bZaxB8wTlG4w/U97noKDVofvl6qOgWdFgolDb7vsV54gpFjmrhQNNGBA AduThRbvSRNcjAbvqakKhn4Ge5Oi8jNggw8IEm0/xWvNIJosEeiQRnJFM8gGi7oQP4Hf RfM6dD4ZiQBRhIam4kWcSLw1I58KmYnswIl+HRWGETgSjJOQ9fibrfHfPJ+hVmPavd36 hIBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530wqYsbX9SMeeDcR/DomSGEQTCBOyWcUaJcAErNo9UhMsfEqPrJ wF4QcSOqdpQVYr4q5pdEINOJTxabXh4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxMlXH2jaucMg+aAa2F/Bjyq8d6SV2pBthrY8Rg+uvYH5MPftwX6B4EBHM1fBNUiEV7vKnqYA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6a87:b029:da:e253:dd6a with SMTP id n7-20020a1709026a87b02900dae253dd6amr5620455plk.81.1607263609965; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 06:06:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z25sm9418301pge.66.2020.12.06.06.06.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Dec 2020 06:06:49 -0800 (PST)
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <134860ee-5fbf-2fb3-a5b3-4be68806ab22@mtcc.com> <CABa8R6veBqY1fUuoy3Qm=vfrV51_5YyoS0P4SLSbKJP_Qrcn-A@mail.gmail.com> <7224575d-685f-5020-073e-c1880acecc88@mtcc.com> <7e459496-61f8-ddcd-713c-3b6be448090c@gmail.com> <2cecceac-1add-44ec-6e16-e157fee293fe@mtcc.com> <5a577765-4a0d-e1bf-5321-dfeff19d107e@gmail.com> <40d7e78e-7026-c65c-383c-df4e3c537de3@mtcc.com> <CABuGu1qpn16+=6CUqpXbAiFrLV87s9Lx4+fqCzNtkD83HVPzEQ@mail.gmail.com> <C456270E-89A3-48BD-B123-1D789682AEBE@bluepopcorn.net> <18e93db9-bde7-bf49-670c-1e680f2ce3a6@tana.it> <65bbc2a6-701a-1729-7892-ef68c1b6b237@mtcc.com> <5bce5710-6553-36ee-c46e-cbde702141e5@tana.it> <CAL0qLwZZ31bYwPphHEDsfeLCRPEZmp7jOZOR5RVof3J5LHxe6w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6b53359c-150a-10a3-75ff-3e1a157ea822@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 06:06:47 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZZ31bYwPphHEDsfeLCRPEZmp7jOZOR5RVof3J5LHxe6w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/_XKc6jDPuCSLZqN43Dpk2M8hVgc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 14:06:53 -0000

On 12/6/2020 5:57 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> It was published through the Independent Submission stream, which can 
> only produce Informational documents.

Since this is the IETF and being picky is de rigueur, I'll note that the 
Independent stream also permits Experimental...

You're welcome.  No need to thank me.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org