Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Mon, 11 November 2019 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB181200B2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 07:50:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SPTMWx636UYX for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 07:50:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5574012008B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 07:50:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id p6so12502098ilp.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 07:50:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YwZTuDPSHuFBPBeFQAdap2/nJUxLrNj54lLAYVaLfqw=; b=V+M7dRWSF3vkpQmA2d8RluPB6XDTLFSJvqUcwVAOEA/HBQUZSLYzDR/vJYOK8UbYuh /ZwGw7mK7TKHT/RfHH6Sh6ftGxYlRpkPoMGN5nMA9u8tX/Myt0skRS0CoqVEUNwApJXE lvIPrupewggNtoqti2YJwQD1YjMaqFGGWJVAk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YwZTuDPSHuFBPBeFQAdap2/nJUxLrNj54lLAYVaLfqw=; b=r39K5UaFhvhC4XC9ZNG3ajU7DjxGXAsq/HkmrBNxG2z8MD8G+cKNNsmi74umGHu5OO v0QcC5K57UJrcdzpA2t/WRoZTNta95TiEWdGWi683a6SoJ1dTx88HThvhlnpmJviQw11 VsSH3iXwFzSo9s6D48MwYEvwC/IL8DM/OlZHupv/b/Fdn3MGY97H/X0e61LXETCWJZfr iK634OtG6+yW4MEzkGzZvxZOtbul2pmY6s7U9DPBHe7AMTcBlikvIMur4xr/xyl6E3MC ml2tWr0YrP8sdHcPO8VOsrcbDs9P9vSY9Sf9Ly/bcepwRIHZnyOgwgHxYTPVhemknJTs DhVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUDF/aa5/1dDFEGoly/CDwcxj75C5HtPTrijt8s72IIvQQsdVID 78K7sihS5rpnb+9KtVt6BCSo/L3mZUezRqjRgnU5Pw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwc62JJn9r5dv4i4IA9Pymf2lfTqASzaPlixCmiw/1DG0Ont8gFOY5XqzbLzZDNP2yDyfigClVPOQvT0AkhE4A=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:831d:: with SMTP id f29mr31266415ild.263.1573487449328; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 07:50:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e580ada3-d9b5-0e5b-9ac3-eade41ac92d2@tana.it> <CAL0qLwa5yR5dVzkDSD48MDgpUa11+ri=KOwrNSqOxi8fB2i6PA@mail.gmail.com> <eabefc6b-7542-1a46-4272-b786433ed0b5@tana.it> <4783309.BXR8ZdE9c3@l5580> <CAL0qLwb5FAaYZ7AX_H=aeUFkv8cvY+xd1bQ5uCDp4tmrbx2CQg@mail.gmail.com> <7a21b80b-e6bb-d8b9-cf63-601a8d1e47e7@tana.it> <C1E711A8-F3A6-4A20-B71D-53FA773A61D9@kitterman.com> <aca25d30-3b01-4eaf-6d0b-3bae6f3f796b@tana.it> <CABuGu1ogeUjW181MMOv3kApZR5njMMH6_84EnHxF0tDq6bhBkA@mail.gmail.com> <db4b1289-31cc-9b9e-bb5c-01bf8d6a37b3@tana.it> <CAL0qLwZcBGL8syD8FyOUkVqMzsmj4=uYM0NaSU2O3hte02AZVg@mail.gmail.com> <e45b7175-713e-da69-cc18-d0e4b59410c3@tana.it> <CAL0qLwZEEzvdvydrUUrBRRDfB-+3_7_9HB244qRC-+361cgwSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbo1AtJ6LG1UuSSoBC-GwjdQsc5CA2h6q5VqMxH=dxK5w@mail.gmail.com> <c1983dac-09ed-ce16-29a9-f4a734ed64c3@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <c1983dac-09ed-ce16-29a9-f4a734ed64c3@tana.it>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 07:50:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1pGxtF=u+odt1+2X3EFBMN6GykO1tE_tVx7FWPGGCgegg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000079ed7d0597141854"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/_ZlytAeE2V6vt-cUMxl9MRpZwjk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 15:50:52 -0000

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 1:23 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

>
> Does the WG agree to an erratum as follows:
>
> TYPE: technical
>
> SECTION: 2.3
>
> ORIGINAL TEXT:
>
>    smtp:  Indicates information that was extracted from an SMTP command
>       that was used to relay the message.  The "property" indicates
>       which SMTP command included the extracted content as a parameter.
>
> CORRECTED TEXT:
>
>    smtp:  Indicates information that was extracted from a parameter of
>       the SMTP session that was used to relay the message.  The
>       "property" indicates which parameter included the extracted content.
>
> NOTES
>
>    This change makes the "smtp" type consistent with the definition of
>    smtp.remote-ip given in rfc8617 Section 10.2.
>

This seems like a bit of a nit, but also seems to be an accurate
wordsmithing of the definition.

--Kurt