IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] not enhanced status codes Some Proposed Language for a New pct Tag Defintion

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 31 July 2021 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08F73A0D43 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=azvtOsCO; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=qm93h6MU
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HSPXDQiZH-Vr for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9614B3A0D71 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 23505 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2021 20:24:27 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=5bce.6105b17b.k2107; bh=er1Wpgfnx/yXm3S+6mJtj6PvWYMYkKYOGPXKnxT2B+g=; b=azvtOsCODkFk1z5HpWiehO+Dr89RdaJBRS35zjZnKCi/EF0BQmQ5KhDGAi/cfoMI5Ra2E2ESDHjW0ABGQ/tbjMO7hFQqC3ynV4n85FiKH3DfPfpQdsgaVEHPpuSOCcdmcrAzYhhxGqudsBx722lDKDxp8q8fitAHHUf8IJtJaFHiL/DoHuWWOKOHYq0b/ISuJSKu2aOl/a4VgfCnWQz+PPMHligZVkIw/794Rm6SjU/H6ChSO/7ZOfzcP+YujHxSx2F7gQsdZKzDH+4LcnrbCsnws3U8hLd9YXkXxioXFoaB7O654kUszgtYbW4Li7RbtzKI3e6FA3mQhnc64CQC5Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=5bce.6105b17b.k2107; bh=er1Wpgfnx/yXm3S+6mJtj6PvWYMYkKYOGPXKnxT2B+g=; b=qm93h6MUQ4DIFKLR5BQ8OH8jNbf6XOuhbZW1UI0BM+lg8STlSyyYn9CQoRbDo60aqqpr9g5asiXBiUP0GEHqiarS5MqtiBv5D6mATvA/NRrByeoMWA2BEfN7LHo1+32JhQx9fGdS4qmnrIVeqLQnXm3cOwzBIchHTvrW5Kb5OOUfyCWBipEJ/E2icFSVS6XWP+bOft7bHqYrAqvYff3+m+DWVzDLSef+++36cjYhwPBIs2Jw/7sScJpkO2XPWG82+dlV8Wp/HzRsUHMhP/7lH0QRkIODAAoq0FNiJdqWko6jgnuHp/1FCEXTa65zwobXLPmTafWLsXXi4ByfKYTCXw==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 31 Jul 2021 20:24:27 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id CE9FD2566204; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:24:25 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 16:24:25 -0400
Message-Id: <20210731202426.CE9FD2566204@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: superuser@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwb114xmTg7Qe5wAg2q316ih4x7RpS8WAomdnjsWDyd0Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/_bBJcl0n7p4PUfJxV4qJR0I9fn4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] not enhanced status codes Some Proposed Language for a New pct Tag Defintion
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:24:36 -0000

It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy  <superuser@gmail.com> said:
>Indeed; I would like to understand what 2.6.0 is meant to convey.  As I
>read the IANA registry entries, "2" means success but "6" means there was a
>media type error.

I think it's supposed to mean "I accepted your message but I wouldn't have if I were
enforcing DMARC p=none".

Since this would be a gift to spammers trying to probe and evade filters, I find it
very unlikely anyone would implement it, so no.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email