Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 03 December 2019 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1601F12003E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 13:21:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=IzL4EKMb; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Pa7//14F
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qt5xqCD927S6 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 13:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74F0C12002F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 13:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 29225 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2019 21:21:48 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=7227.5de6d1ec.k1912; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=TUskWYsQ2PAWUAqLrB50svzsRIbep0xuo5w+5g70a3I=; b=IzL4EKMbDr+4k90djZBkZj4JnLwjfUEgS5+laFVk3dTObmF3hjZo4GbogxguIlIa3lQta8Gn3DLza2E6+qnQ1/ghKJSWl+8LD2We592NsVoReJdrRUVnPKaWxYU8R7OT/INfGKbVtCxmtDfInJFzsg2oehTpodvyHDbp+4EGYh2cl3WbNLUYtIDEh5hQPKSG345M7uHyM6yUZpqaA10O+BFynjXUANGnMRCXe7cwf2kT/dLBnN5vuQOkC3ub4af8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=7227.5de6d1ec.k1912; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=TUskWYsQ2PAWUAqLrB50svzsRIbep0xuo5w+5g70a3I=; b=Pa7//14F3HJIbfXt3X8zTWQ0Itf/D1HfAw2vNqR7u/DhsgN7P/lYEL/jipVtDi1SBT2Dbroc0qMLRHrE8GIqhKz3cNCBhzQNTaHPh6TFLEtmU1xi8bx05B5pGTvprF1yESKGwEVy1MJGHkhk514Y5rOLUS3+CE0yavc2gzbjRKF1Vp7PFpAorlhztXm74B0XJzPa1iwl7ZPgvzMR63AeRqxaqXdze/voXKb5vdGN8DAbbea23YOT3ZOt/r2TTBgt
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 03 Dec 2019 21:21:47 -0000
Date: 3 Dec 2019 16:21:47 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.99999.374.1912031621140.9180@ary.qy>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: "IETF DMARC WG" <dmarc@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwa=zs29zKHZmhzB7RSQyT7wRUCdqh1LSLTksX8d6h5naQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwbo1AtJ6LG1UuSSoBC-GwjdQsc5CA2h6q5VqMxH=dxK5w@mail.gmail.com> <20191111155410.12A31E9E35A@ary.qy> <CAL0qLwa=zs29zKHZmhzB7RSQyT7wRUCdqh1LSLTksX8d6h5naQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.99999 (OSX 374 2019-10-27)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/aFy_4bu9t6tc6dl-XAYgx1HfptA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 21:21:52 -0000

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 7:54 AM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

Nice to know I'm not the only one who lets my mail marinate for a while.

> Assuming the ptype we're talking about is "dns" which is defined in the
> same document, the definition is terse and there's not much guidance for
> the designated expert about what things should be allowed with respect to
> future registrations.  I think Scott basically said the same thing.  I'd
> like to see those points addressed before green lighting it.

Seems reasonable.  Ale should be able to spin up a new one.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly