Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (Deprecate rf= and maybe fo= tag) - With Interim Notes
Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> Fri, 28 May 2021 18:34 UTC
Return-Path: <dotzero@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05DB3A315E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8P5X0ovuiVlM for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8D633A315C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id c10so3370387qtx.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=o9COzfetnYjhiSzR3T74UOibpZnBf6Xs1yFYc+ig2nA=; b=SYPjUYKJcCgw4+cjXOV673PLSGkuMt9nQ7LCjL4GkgF0682aTkcjAlnqD9UC2XI3vV I1bIACnlFrWoRQ/7cOPkeFa8edYmfhVR9NXcz2P9zMWOjRsLz9lseJf7pZyT3omt9bFI 1IoEBUlJU5dxt9D/KR1pZkaYXL6bSTnMEfWsgPdlqQj0ItpPPD/8EHq+ldLspPr5/kdw LMgc1x7JN396wmfOUfCp4sPP/XY0KhmASDfkfgmUN+PN+poRsm4AL47/R05+UabMy7bQ dmPltX/onJaFYNZAF23ICE3W1JKqBNIz/KupE03d2uPttmPWj0U9j6AujzF5KVLtB8TF E/DQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=o9COzfetnYjhiSzR3T74UOibpZnBf6Xs1yFYc+ig2nA=; b=sOE+WpHMB/4huHmgZFlVbEkccZ3VaEN1qIPLCwQfCo4iBZXHB/S/rD/IR1ORUMkSor 6JjiXj8LWfrlbJa1u1YDtkXCJ6Wy+p40VDJdlZTeZhcPJTqo2Ti9F44TinS0HeNjEQuu rz9rC7x8vrwmunUC8Yugnla9GIsWYYF7xaHRCj8nEFcU4vksmVCvo/Rd2fQiC73RwoK5 bcKgk5BQGWxWhRvqFacdoPGvKOzccOH5ompjhf7m89toGzy2bQ4Fmt7BV1lr4Oa/ac6g HLjEWvMYz/L4LWzRkHS/42ptyIPgWbzLZt8GTmYh0qW3gL37hWWv5yFjQikYgMZ2FHBO +dTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RwTAceJeFsaXcRLG9YajCPk1QqrF3hqKKZe5UTFbdpclDPe4+ 3pNybeJmCyfWsziTsCxHV4tCBnQaFhPd7UkEgpM54N7Rg5RBrg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwT022IyztUJ+x2p0LNxJWpJLzn4Y6yGhxFbLJBZILAXhgjmW9aDhwM3D+xcBVJBcGspngyGOMjS5dayqG5NYk=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5bc2:: with SMTP id b2mr4617884qtb.220.1622226855191; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHej_8kt3Z2FgDAaZQdfsTqv0V0nMNW68ZSj9CPd+7wkuT3Ozw@mail.gmail.com> <18f41a62-3930-d1c8-b8e4-f04445ae7cf9@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <18f41a62-3930-d1c8-b8e4-f04445ae7cf9@tana.it>
From: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 14:34:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ4XoYcskZzTuoN86-wAvsOXp=qa1jVZ-OHDnJnqeGgZDpK0JA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000072ea7f05c3681f0d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/auN8BegIOmvS9KBQgkncqoIVvQ8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (Deprecate rf= and maybe fo= tag) - With Interim Notes
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 18:34:22 -0000
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:32 PM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote: > On Fri 28/May/2021 17:47:25 +0200 Todd Herr wrote: > > > > Consensus on Ticket #82 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/82> > (Deprecate > > rf= and maybe fo= tag) was reached during the May 27 DMARC Interim to > remove > > the "rf" tag from the core spec and allow for the possibility that it > could > > potentially be reintroduced, if needed, in the separate failure > reporting spec. > > (The fo tag was not discussed during this part of the Interim). > > > Agree to totally eliminate rf= from the spec. As an unknown tag, it won't > invalidate existing DMARC records. > > > Best > Ale > -- > > +1 Michael Hammer
- [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (Depre… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (D… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (D… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (D… Steven M Jones
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (D… Todd Herr