Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
Autumn Tyr-Salvia <atyrsalvia@agari.com> Tue, 28 July 2020 21:11 UTC
Return-Path: <atyrsalvia@agari.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D39C3A07EC for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=agari.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vRcrkhvSyoQ0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam04on0726.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe4d::726]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B96223A07D6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=n9KQmPbQJ6+9o5vsKsl3YFbajxH7o5RLSTWNhyIolEtdY8Irjw41V1LoS0V7oD7Jp3srV3Mt8wXYBF5QkzD8cjfHaWLZEav7ajkxT9wsc3tTjEg+zIN61ryfitWImnixMTNvGHlzE3Sukf9py47Ki8gWuUhNZT1AjYjP1Havc5VLyB3zhcAGCoYLZF7f+ouTX7ENCxYkpg2W8bumj5cb3+CM8WF1F846V5p7oTRwxMyLrS8+JwEWgonjEyW9ZiFdTvB8IrFM4nZo02s2bgAG2jpICBsJZaXcnhXr0217zDWKh2s16wrk8h8Kq+JXcljKWOQP8mqzR1Bv31KmEK1vuw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=K2Qqsuq+TSLuLZxFC/NarxXaeaoFynRr3b1PBOU+oYg=; b=VwQXZ/mtm/Tp1E/QRPStlS2S40H6G/698+S3wJ/W/ArD7TDKbGBHdmOqEixU/v4C8YYworWCuV+CqwE4jCQu7pVYOCZyfiaeWTY3LP2he0S5qxFrwQ5itZmdH1yT/M1rt1ZGHsSzaVwzoc9sMYp6aSDq+k+Ae8zcCtbVROUYdkFJFtC1Owu3tgtg1c89QqOmSqpHyUeFxCtxiTLzX7YccfPCb/Cwj6n2zOxtzQY3PKw1+7tLrT51q29f2+ozyh0F+zzE9bIWfMmFZQkeAtmzbg5U6fmMKH8XrCBurc7ZmBgPdUtsFzfCA/roymEJGjpoRLbVchO8j9irAyXXEsxN5g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=agari.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=agari.com; dkim=pass header.d=agari.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=agari.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=K2Qqsuq+TSLuLZxFC/NarxXaeaoFynRr3b1PBOU+oYg=; b=RHiD3OKlr3pCwDrHD2p5wfRoWWkTB7ksxDJNJksDNwTVFJ1vWidF1/rXMc6i0GQGxcUibGcOctWq+T4EBfU4yCAN4NnWTB1M5AT6hVc01EZ8gOGR++ohITP9g9sNgSLHQY65YvWR3IdDmJo0cNzHuH16H+KCHR3LLKHNxkVUKx8=
Received: from BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:191::27) by BY5PR13MB3777.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:219::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3239.13; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:11:12 +0000
Received: from BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1a5:56e5:b660:ec1f]) by BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1a5:56e5:b660:ec1f%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3239.015; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:11:12 +0000
From: Autumn Tyr-Salvia <atyrsalvia@agari.com>
To: Todd Herr <todd.herr=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
CC: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
Thread-Index: AQHWZKh8JcOQ838b0UOee1lvwkySbakdQicAgAArsgCAAATJgIAAB7wAgAAC0js=
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:11:12 +0000
Message-ID: <BY5PR13MB29993AD874B3A34BA088D87BD7730@BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BY5PR13MB29998094418C8A6C25902569D7730@BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <20200728173716.068CB1D9840C@ary.qy> <CAHej_8na3MLm1i4AZzgbL=7EZ7QBX8OvSB4BOqHg-1osBc4H_w@mail.gmail.com> <655df0e7-4fef-e441-9a57-df4a10aa1fa3@taugh.com>, <CAHej_8mztD91jeSA3S=ypdJO7B+9AhM+2ox=mhWOfz--3b0Aog@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHej_8mztD91jeSA3S=ypdJO7B+9AhM+2ox=mhWOfz--3b0Aog@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=agari.com;
x-originating-ip: [108.69.133.171]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 72c9c2b9-979e-40a2-a887-08d8333ac1ab
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR13MB3777:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR13MB37773D910CEBD429996CFDD5D7730@BY5PR13MB3777.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: SnwFJxBplexZH+8bXtxfNsLtQ+HLWIlcaKPyhKmJTd49zYSI7LpMslxMaRhyziX/ZEO3duBZ2sB4PAi3GIae9yex5jPStyjz1/irmMMImRh2RbHRwlni/gOK+M0CDQED4QEBfedH0QDjnour+WyhzRSY2Nz9oRJj71hJt4d/Bt6PKL5G/EYYAfdx4lni6KVuKianPjtSwLQGJnikOJYO8uQyM1qLoiwnhv9iYdFN9QG6JS3CtylEgrJgVhS1990vfPyDgEcPzWYbuce24gXu4TJGuQFh9yFLZwKV4YobQ01YDuPqZbcVwLQ3VwS/KK8YyEXxCVlcAXPW24+tmOzeEM9IvwXYkuA0G9t44PrupEJzT8Tgu61QAjLC0H4hhEvkPNcgVTTt1nB9iNEO0LG3qdjdcHdcDc1Y2J4doApkOlUy9nxOLDJ1lpPhT4hw9bpu66cnx28g0OULTqOpfV0s7M4QOjNLVg0jyegiotGoP7s=
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(39850400004)(136003)(396003)(376002)(346002)(366004)(2906002)(52536014)(55016002)(8676002)(66946007)(66476007)(66446008)(66556008)(19627405001)(76116006)(71200400001)(64756008)(53546011)(6506007)(7696005)(316002)(966005)(9686003)(110136005)(508600001)(5660300002)(26005)(8936002)(86362001)(33656002)(186003)(166002)(83380400001)(4326008)(223123001)(130980200001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY5PR13MB29993AD874B3A34BA088D87BD7730BY5PR13MB2999namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: agari.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 72c9c2b9-979e-40a2-a887-08d8333ac1ab
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Jul 2020 21:11:12.1758 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 05773123-385e-420d-844e-f01aee5e37ab
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: UKfYYvwrGFtUH+9N5edu2klKHVjdIby5Y8319KC6LiUkDxR0hi58iYGAGaJjDGs5p/k/DwnIig1D11wOHn/agQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR13MB3777
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Si8kOArcdTs67UHLQG-zkRpw0Ec>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:11:16 -0000
To Todd's point, I think the answer on which policy would be applied at least needs to be predictable. If one receiver chooses one policy and a different receiver chooses the other policy, that is going to make it significantly more complicated for complex organizations to implement a DMARC p=reject or even p=quarantine policy. Thanks, Autumn Tyr-Salvia atyrsalvia@agari.com Agari Principal Customer Success Engineer ________________________________ From: dmarc <dmarc-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Todd Herr <todd.herr=40valimail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 1:58 PM To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:30 PM John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com<mailto:johnl@taugh.com>> wrote: On Tue, 28 Jul 2020, Todd Herr wrote: > Using the Sender header and the "snd" bits in the DMARC policy for > firstbrand.com<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffirstbrand.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Catyrsalvia%40agari.com%7C92171061501e4c0b556008d833390787%7C05773123385e420d844ef01aee5e37ab%7C0%7C0%7C637315667319827245&sdata=1AHw64v72T7eJ%2BNrnkkUsSnky%2F1H2CqV3tA1t1X0FvM%3D&reserved=0>, DMARC would pass for the Sender domain and fail for the > From domain. > > Which verdict gets applied to the message? I believe the reasoanble answer is both, and the filtering engine evaluates both based on their reputations. Two responses, two different but equally valid answers, the other (Dave's) being "receiver discretion", which *could* be an umbrella term to include John's answer, but would certainly also include other applications of rules for this scenario. Note that I'm not at all opposed to the idea put forth in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-crocker-dmarc-sender/<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-crocker-dmarc-sender%2F&data=02%7C01%7Catyrsalvia%40agari.com%7C92171061501e4c0b556008d833390787%7C05773123385e420d844ef01aee5e37ab%7C0%7C0%7C637315667319827245&sdata=6Z2zUXQD8CB14mF9Tw9bNDVb7k5dyqUAez%2BJ%2B8TPYUs%3D&reserved=0> but I do believe that there will have to evolve a very limited set of known and expected possibilities for how such messages will be handled, or else wails will be wailed, teeth will be gnashed, and garments will be rent, especially among those trying to do the right thing when sending email and the deliverability people they employ. -- Todd Herr | Sr. Technical Program Manager e: todd.herr@valimail.com<mailto:todd.herr@valimail.com> p: 703.220.4153 [https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/_vs__6iRjfmT2Ae5LLNBb8nEopl2M5Tl5QlpS6LS0Lh0vv4TYnZu-Mff2kDFOqe0LhbnSXprAx4yoaTvq_Tc_7n1b8yzGIqoxuhedthDxYQansg8ChT2x5EcZV3rjz19-Dx9rESL] This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
- [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differ… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jeremy Harris
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Ken O'Driscoll
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Luis E. Muñoz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- [dmarc-ietf] LSAP - Lightweight Signer Authorizat… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Ken O'Driscoll
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hannu Aronsson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hannu Aronsson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Tõnu Tammer
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Tim Draegen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] my forward signer draft, third p… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] my forward signer draft, third p… Rolf E. Sonneveld