[dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
Autumn Tyr-Salvia <atyrsalvia@agari.com> Tue, 28 July 2020 06:54 UTC
Return-Path: <atyrsalvia@agari.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D246F3A0CEB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 23:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=agari.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15uB9gHRqYjN for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 23:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn7nam10on2110.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.92.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03D9A3A0CEA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 23:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=JDR6ffbQtNbSMDWpt+NFkYWuWYgtQ++/aLRPi5smR5e6D163w7wm9gtCuheC/8gfBwfSADiVIOpQ7CgcEKNlsRMAdfjhPq4p0DT2pb6His2TElR1zn5gwbco/EXcc7wSFNoIr/nLGeApanS8LSLmyv1OFoXgpUGcboIRFWdr9Fey+yQZy4oAvG03d7/56CG1P1BtKsAQ/HXb8Q+qLrEc3DT3K9DUVcof1jbu3+0E5p+CHXLmjAAUGg2xgQlUvZ5soORyslabvCdTy8Aoj2JffTWRrOwmUyJ9lPVQDx6B1dgsUK5BkFKXC+it5o7ifFG4c7fcJPkMuC7lM6z0fFfqXw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6TgYCvCg0jmXGYZyGgfpkZbiUrK8pfZvTjEdHZkpsHQ=; b=j4kTA3CkR2ZrQhidEqPNxk6mu3i1eAFrFNJJekL1vE5bWoIaToOghSUSQBKrciNGho+xoHLQUSJueP7a5CY8+N46vC6UfNO6Z5RThwMr6CzmnOYeubO/UDe3zBHxlEbW/qUqlksHGpTQGujvMgEojS5rCmaB95kMuJOHvzTMxILIwtZyYgoSpPlR7ikojWpFV8dhjMREhfncLyDRrdZGrcsC/mi9VrPEr1gOGEkjVwPHNiN4DFw+7egiNqcYLxKXydOswUjzOfwshxYyPzun8IspAvBPuXvnYxYxmTYZp219yOEdPtrIFUni2c2Sa+puvL3Nl6PtQZJzV+W7jK5uNw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=agari.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=agari.com; dkim=pass header.d=agari.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=agari.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6TgYCvCg0jmXGYZyGgfpkZbiUrK8pfZvTjEdHZkpsHQ=; b=N7zpZ3WWVKFC6HWiC0S5vnnCrwsxxXg/fVqjoaX6GROXfgo+fOwepUmF2C7QW7mhz9EH2U9+PSBNkNWwtZpMRcxD9G/JQPGekt9c5xsPZbc8J65UuiRAgzItsYdvqv0f4hl1xrAccusNs/lKzXfoAFHDm/E1v5cEW2i82HBprJQ=
Received: from BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:191::27) by BYAPR13MB2343.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a02:c5::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3239.10; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 06:54:02 +0000
Received: from BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1a5:56e5:b660:ec1f]) by BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1a5:56e5:b660:ec1f%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3239.015; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 06:54:02 +0000
From: Autumn Tyr-Salvia <atyrsalvia@agari.com>
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
Thread-Index: AQHWZKh8JcOQ838b0UOee1lvwkySbQ==
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 06:54:02 +0000
Message-ID: <BY5PR13MB29998094418C8A6C25902569D7730@BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=agari.com;
x-originating-ip: [108.69.133.171]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5bd5fb11-0059-4959-f8d5-08d832c302eb
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR13MB2343:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR13MB23439BAB4FB24431FCD5CA74D7730@BYAPR13MB2343.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: X2HeRp3+se15u9xu09nwdATglNMJziyb5SecBB2CoMIfznwe6HpFmt/IcM/xaMcSYnb+rf5Tsbu0l5NOEmRi7DmnV+ig0T+R23tDwcZcovX8XafIoDhJ3FtdiqkmxYjr+0ID4QL0mpXAKjwpniGf/ErO2p8OTpqu/hXUkZVpk1rGiYLixpRBa9JnmSVpLjFdgNV345FV/6rmijPveMkVRPwQKtmo+V2XkR4hQtOfgGW+DwN9aeLSzrZ2LMVCXpijH45hzC6GkcTwV1PRYJDjgcZvlLa6kiDwhesHesvJdiiZbgaTnZAeSJSIUg52NuODP3rbX8Phz1zB9ctRYkiNzERekon2M5pvXJE8saWFAUOzj7mJbo26b8U1CG2+CBbvb9K404f1idNM11MRMl/LzsMaeDOXAXBTpRNMcgc7zlo=
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(39850400004)(376002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(83380400001)(8936002)(71200400001)(7696005)(2906002)(55016002)(8676002)(9686003)(6916009)(508600001)(316002)(86362001)(52536014)(5660300002)(26005)(186003)(66946007)(66446008)(6506007)(64756008)(76116006)(33656002)(66476007)(66556008)(19627405001)(130980200001)(223123001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY5PR13MB29998094418C8A6C25902569D7730BY5PR13MB2999namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: agari.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BY5PR13MB2999.namprd13.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5bd5fb11-0059-4959-f8d5-08d832c302eb
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Jul 2020 06:54:02.1116 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 05773123-385e-420d-844e-f01aee5e37ab
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: WiPRRZuXKlD+ZH8JTUgwrKqSFK9qtB1Ai8dfqaO7otXtKyYBYPxRjIOjXifzQPA9lvliUDnHMkus7MZ6tdch1A==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR13MB2343
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/qIYLjq5HdyV4dV_OnFKnRilE5zc>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differing header domains
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 06:54:08 -0000
Hello, I recently had a conversation with Dave Crocker about proposed changes for DMARC, and mentioned a use case to him that is not well served by the current situation that is not a mailing list. He said it might be useful to share this to this list, so I'm writing it out here. A customer of mine is a large financial services company. Like many in that field, they have acquired several other companies over the years, and now operate multiple different brands, which send email using different domains. While many companies like this maintain one primary domain for corporate email and others only for marketing purposes, this company maintains multiple distinct domains even for corporate workplace email. The challenge is that they have many administrative assistants who send out meeting calendar invitations on behalf of the executives they support, and the executive and the assistant do not always use the same email domain. The resulting messages are not aligned, so they fail DMARC. To put it another way: * assistant@firstbrand.com is organizing a meeting for executive@secondbrand.com * assistant@firstbrand.com sends out a calendar invite from their own messaging client, using executive@secondbrand.com in the From: field * The resulting message uses executive@secondbrand.com in the friendly From: field, but firstbrand.com in the SMTP MAIL FROM domain, so the headers are no longer aligned for SPF. * Both firstbrand.com and secondbrand.com are set to DMARC p=reject. * Messages like this are then rejected by receivers that validate DMARC results. Whenever possible, they tell me they change the assistant's email domain to match the executives they support, but as people leave or change departments, they sometimes end up with assistants supporting executives across multiple different domains, so they can't ensure they always have the same domain. Maybe the ultimate answer for this customer and others in a similar situation is simply that this is a use case that can no longer be supported due to evolving security needs, and yet if that's the case, I thought it would be helpful to share a real world scenario that is currently impacted that isn't part of the previously existing discussion around mailing lists. Thanks, Autumn Tyr-Salvia atyrsalvia@agari.com Agari Principal Customer Success Engineer
- [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for differ… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jeremy Harris
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Ken O'Driscoll
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Luis E. Muñoz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- [dmarc-ietf] LSAP - Lightweight Signer Authorizat… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Ken O'Driscoll
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hannu Aronsson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Hannu Aronsson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Tõnu Tammer
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Autumn Tyr-Salvia
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Tim Draegen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] non-mailing list use case for di… Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] third party authorization, not, … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] my forward signer draft, third p… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] my forward signer draft, third p… Rolf E. Sonneveld