Re: [dmarc-ietf] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-21: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 21 November 2018 04:12 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B30B130EAA; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:12:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05AMCuUAMtFb; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:12:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D9FE130DE4; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:12:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Svantevit.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wAL4CRWj026463 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:12:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.roach.at
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol@ietf.org, tjw.ietf@gmail.com, dmarc@ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, dmarc-chairs@ietf.org
References: <154277322456.29950.9124294245241485227.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <03df6fc1-f2f2-6f17-62af-896a141c6786@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:12:22 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <154277322456.29950.9124294245241485227.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/b0ZjxtP3K2josM_oSZc4tA5IsAU>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-21: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 04:12:33 -0000

>> Received: from [10.10.10.131] (w-x-y-z.dsl.static.isp.com [w.x.y.z])


Oh, I missed this one -- the domain ISP.com is registered and in active 
use. Please consider changing to "isp.example" or similar.

/a