[dmarc-ietf] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-dmarc-02-00: (with COMMENT)

[Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-dmarc-02-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dmarc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

** Per:
“However, the working group may
reclaim the base document from the RFC Editor only if”

(Editorial) Shouldn’t this sentence be written without “only” – “However, the
working group, with AD concurrence, may reclaim the base document from the RFC
Editor if …”

(Process point) Added the words about the AD because technically, the WG can’t
pull the document back themselves.

** Per:
“The responsible Area
Director will have discretion regarding whether a full Last Call and
IESG loop is needed to review those limited modifications.”

Why is this sentence needed?  The process described is always the case.