Re: [dmarc-ietf] reporting documents, Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 28 December 2020 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BAF3A0CCE for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 10:00:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LZgI2SvoIzhF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 10:00:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x230.google.com (mail-oi1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B2F93A0CCD for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 10:00:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x230.google.com with SMTP id q25so12187105oij.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 10:00:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=30KRFiERt4rA28AMkuJN7wLUWlIlplKV5rjHoRCz0oE=; b=Gv/Yrd1tDMwrpFblCE00MgUMjxypUt6Zjw8iJClV7lqxSbt1DiNXqjOwW9FOnxlo0I 2D/UUBIbn6O9RiEWud2NhLtN2bPS4MIAtCsY0GhHZK3B6wzIsu9y5vKcOGJGO/plRdgO XYy6K634RHeiWlDJkZxr1vJL2w+wETmPFGarODVygvIub6VGBJ07EIplt1foSWd62tK1 d/txkl5idgkv9Bvprse1Dc2WeuSkvNbCrsFfGD1kdQjrYPX3YqQwvurom1oo67VyZmhh bFd5rLRqBCAVPL42NbQHdYJ7VZ542szS88xzzaYJw/VDk8p992DmGnI+KskoluRlk+PJ VB5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=30KRFiERt4rA28AMkuJN7wLUWlIlplKV5rjHoRCz0oE=; b=sB0YRXc8OfHXU9L7edScg3DVu0nuJljfhl9rzXlbQq97vUgoHWBwV6Q9SRppHGZlun o4WMYVDAeduFcTT78vyyG7T1gFMtMde/5RYP9SuN9iKWtXjmcbMEMVhLXTt/8q6cqJB8 4frNN296jHdOtvF+a5uYiIVZl+8xCvxD2xolhpptAUEP6VInGSEAyvqHJHDgbkIkKF/L Ers/bRFS1icLrw9M0FBc0+p6Z3XB6IGTGhnE7bxebVrGly+aCNOcFEeMip1n8yV7HHfh x9e16iJ8PB41lEObNoeB3/f2wpor7JScJaDsh6PdW0EFNl1xT25is2MR1wq6IuLV6mug 3B3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bBWDpNtvSBrGe6cFJSCLt7kDz2ZisSmPfmbgUhequnn5t6njF wegyuR4JcnthTQ8tYtdZB6R3Bol1tRSQ/kQOf/o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9YOm/Y0RrPTdK04uC58o4AI+INUJgoZeMElokcuYy/c7OBL/44YTgbpoFssIMC4oIAhjWRXh0bwCbQJ8tlsQ=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c3c6:: with SMTP id t189mr47527oif.21.1609178423682; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 10:00:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201218023900.E73B82ACBB2B@ary.qy> <3034face-b6fc-0ce2-fa1b-f59210bd6f5b@tana.it> <46339b38-3b24-bcb7-5e73-8a97038ed69@taugh.com> <3997c81d-3b30-0823-a752-fb1d60a44593@tana.it> <74a5c37-19a6-6f6f-a51d-6e5cca5b29e8@taugh.com> <CAJ4XoYdXWTgADpdL1eJuYGnpSY038vj-FW_x1f2rEp1JL0r2oA@mail.gmail.com> <01RTICXKLL3E0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <c5f7413e-52c1-6710-16e5-63f59d2c24b9@taugh.com> <CAL0qLwYDeV9CmFg9qCCGPse00JV30WRiSC4orC-EitK=hiahgA@mail.gmail.com> <a79dd75-4d73-d1dc-d6b1-272de866b950@taugh.com> <CAL0qLwZXu3FxH7QGBS7PGbeDwfDTGmC=rbPEQidVV4eDJNHLUA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ4XoYeK2cJb+easc=mqCi4ap1932LmbDdfxM1dFZKrdo2a2mw@mail.gmail.com> <acfe3d9e-97eb-50ee-26a2-568fdd8359dd@taugh.com> <CADyWQ+GJ62jt=dL9Gzuw_O7USNbS=86BqAzu8Rdv9sCb5OpCdw@mail.gmail.com> <d4a00be5-bd61-0c05-3431-8d56b39a3550@tana.it> <8813331f-f5e4-faa5-c6d-11212fc25797@taugh.com> <5d150251-427c-5c44-a0c3-ad2e7f24b692@tana.it> <01RTP8I70EYI004QVR@mauve.mrochek.com> <6a4a11ea-fae2-81f5-ce5f-fbd4bc1d41e2@taugh.com>
In-Reply-To: <6a4a11ea-fae2-81f5-ce5f-fbd4bc1d41e2@taugh.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:00:12 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+GrxxVBBGSViap-Hmjty+jq69ak51hY2fUOn1jryUHCHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000052eb2405b78a0c3d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/caEWnvGRScKWlTzLh94rLyzYlho>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] reporting documents, Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 18:00:26 -0000

I will admit my memory can get pretty hazy, but I agree with Mr Levine - I
remember splitting out reporting,
but only as one document.

The Working Group can always make a compelling case to change this

tim


On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 12:06 PM John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, Ned Freed wrote:
> > I'm not ethusiastic about the split, but if that's what people want then
> so be
> > it. I will say that my experience has been that doing so is usually more
> work
> > and provides less benefit than you'd expect.
>
> I recall agreeing to split out all of the reporting into a separate draft,
> which makes some sense so the two parts can proceed separately, but not
> further splitting aggregate and failure reports.
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>