Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion

So what’s the conclusion on this? I still see the dmarc meeting on the 
agenda page, but without any agenda or meeting materials (unlike 
virtually every other WG meeting).

-Jim

On 13 Nov 2020, at 12:26, Tim Wicinski wrote:

> Dave
>
> It's the latter.   Alexey and I are quite fine with running the 
> meeting,
> that was part of our conversation.
>
> tim
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:23 PM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>
>> On 11/13/2020 10:40 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>> During the chairs call this morning we were discussing the upcoming
>>> meeting.  Now Seth has a conflict with the meeting time that can't 
>>> be
>>> altered.   Since work items have been progressing rather well 
>>> recently,
>>> and the editors are in positing, we discussed canceling the meeting. 
>>>  We
>>> wanted to get some feedback from the working group.
>>>
>>> Here is a lightweight agenda Seth put together.  Should we 1) have a
>>> meeting around these topics;  2) discuss other topics or 3) cancel 
>>> the
>>> meeting and keep moving along.
>>
>>
>> Four days before a scheduled, rare meeting, it's being canceled 
>> because
>> one of its 3 chairs can't attend?
>>
>> Or because it has suddenly been realized that the meeting won't be 
>> useful?
>>
>> Really?
>>
>> d/
>> --
>> Dave Crocker
>> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>> bbiw.net
>>

> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc