Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Wed, 17 July 2019 05:18 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7032120125 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 22:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=BnyiUTDg; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=op4OQYc9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aEkHbFjXDLYn for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 22:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EF45120058 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 22:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58B41F805B5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:18:52 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1563340732; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=UvjsoFuOUhmtGiFKY0oRQpBinl3tg9adQb5q8oYQ3Tg=; b=BnyiUTDg/Z1oRVDau1Xo9DNY2YsE9b2Js3VG1PJl0mB01KpDR+0SWJC+ jxWXj3an7jrflrHqV4h7RT8fxE49CQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1563340732; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=UvjsoFuOUhmtGiFKY0oRQpBinl3tg9adQb5q8oYQ3Tg=; b=op4OQYc9UuMGdCfAgr9DGfldmTBWECLeQxz5+aGwlj9adHCaW0IY+a6f DhtopYIZl368lH6VZVrcXzScLiWCHR42smPgLQQdMg4YTuLkMWxNururnY M7Vzevh51XlKtc9SsxrQ+JTNQa6CMS9cwJm0OwBbDBtE+4i2+N+dBWuXxH gIqQoUI59/WpClh5lfsQwLZbnYuTqu3ZfQN+HTxqh3QTlZSxtnvp5Q1+cq /jT8hhLBrETjsBtS89jUY6c21U9M+UMxCGzzRYgjl11WW6YP4BcUYxqzqo EIQ2wccC3WKEYXm6PPgCs1TAUi/HrZ5prMtSKikUPzQBiusKQ+ibdQ==
Received: from l5580.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2600:380:4a72:99c3:ca:14c:24f3:8d22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1254F8008C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:18:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:18:50 -0400
Message-ID: <4893889.n8NqrlkhcF@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <1801771.HRRXnOL2G4@l5580>
References: <CAL0qLwbbz_UhBLsURg=eXhRBC2g9OghiN==T9Uq9pFuLtd=b7w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfN0+nxpN1P_nk3y5f8MTQ=c7DYNvYic2iDMuCK_bNa=qg@mail.gmail.com> <1801771.HRRXnOL2G4@l5580>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/d0CnGU7O3WgitCfu7MEW9NyTTHk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 05:18:56 -0000

On Friday, July 12, 2019 1:22:21 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> > As Secretary, there are three items that have not yet reached consensus
> > that must be resolved during WGLC:
> > 
> > 1. What further context is needed in the introduction
> > 2. If explicit call outs to ICANN/limited operator capacity to implement
> > are needed
> > 3. If an np= tag is needed to allow PSD functioning for only NXDOMAINs
> 
> It's been a pretty quiet last call.  I think the document itself is probably
> in pretty good shape with these questions as outliers.  Shortly I plan to
> send a separate email on each of these with my perspective on both the
> issue and my read of the discussion so far so we can focus on driving each
> question to closure.

I think we've had some good discussion since Friday.  Here's where I think we 
are now:

#1.  I think we incorporate both the specific suggestions Tim Draegen made 
earlier in the month and we should incorporate changes from Kurt Andersen in 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/7Qjo6oEoUpPGvCWVFZHyBeCDI44 :

Drop the sentence from section 1, make the 2.2 change, drop willing to accept 
in 2.6 (which I think cures the section 4 comment), and make the 3.5 change.  
Addition of np is covered in #3.

#2.  I think we've worked out text and we just need to add it.

#3.  I think we're close on text with the only open questions being does np 
fall back to sp or p and do people agree with the Appendix A words.

Pretty close.  If the group accepts my rationale for the sp fallback, then I 
think it's pretty clear what changes the document needs after last call.

Scott K