Re: [dmarc-ietf] AD review of draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-03.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sat, 03 November 2018 03:25 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07486130E13 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 20:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3GFHU1j2qNGu for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 20:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E10D1277C8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 20:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id n26-v6so2619682lfl.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 20:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bALgdSaGaj+iAbhb2EFyh83C14b3sitnj55tqU7yl+c=; b=Hgn5skJYXpCzjqEA6CxWnAp8LY0rnDes5tcv0SfSy0IeKk/bmalcz9CB1IP9iGhigi FUlnKGiQ/s3bactNvuU9EO3d5fafqP9bQlL8FX78dwUHIbroKV0HlzV44B2feNQmsn4o Dc45tcC0txt8luCTasb+VOIv9v7eJl67zb0eCAb5MuRDJKKvke0LzN6CEKedu0S7CB9I 7id0qc9aMaNxA0a66nEaPwYfZEan8E1G/mpeWZEvPPg+W/ejzv45rVPacH6nIdrTYwFV Ltc8ZGntk7cFtQBGzsfuxjG8KWedBzq3F8AWzsplyq6gREcmjA4AVAAxZM6nYEfnqjeA OHig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bALgdSaGaj+iAbhb2EFyh83C14b3sitnj55tqU7yl+c=; b=swE6/NS9uKPOwH6n84zJezWSF1RrGVgmIqlQWw8HCrJtFQJxSbBkGo/FJuenBLIv3c AAqQKc0At2PHaTzttmbJ2ZvDQxzx+2MeZnB3Wz+qmWLwBSidLLKly+B2tJ5FREakiUv7 Vejw8EdRhsJlB0rJmCDYUJYTPWiMIZRVq2EXrcYkjoThGFHxfq+cxXh/DmqykxIKqpWQ ldG52GGBdsoiJPN3WKVpp5EdAKWaHdslM2mmKL+nAiS/YNaQc/QopL434EfTnXKW/uNp +b5Vrxrbon/FB/qNorCcKWvX30B1SlPeYwHGpAuLhYzPhdrs9sJkr/8wT//yMpxxYmQ7 T21w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIjkqN1ifNPGNOjvYXYOWz3EzxaS8ZrO41GRAt27Rm5q646SFQ3 U/bG9WXohsoIKDGGXh4G1QR/RYgyr2AKTwZOsaH8WL7F
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fVs0UGVSVJlIFxPgITwLdcHTKzpLVRoWyFk0ObbWOVdHQa7LU6BY/4ZDPdR8ebVOmU9KHqUn4o6oWYU9vvs3g=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:6f0a:: with SMTP id k10mr7866885lfc.119.1541215527270; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 20:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3eea2f77-8aea-4f49-80f3-d96b639c378a@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <3eea2f77-8aea-4f49-80f3-d96b639c378a@isode.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 12:25:15 +0900
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZjLzUdWH+sz=TifJEF-zQVevUHug=um9+6dUvU_5f4dA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000067fc90579ba34ad"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/dXF4UhJukSLIpa9RZt5JhZ554rM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] AD review of draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 03:25:31 -0000

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:03 PM Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>;
wrote:

> 1) I am not sure that deleted IANA registry descriptions (when compared
> to RFC 7601) is the best way, considering that this document obsoletes
> RFC 7601. I think it would be better to just keep the text and add a
> sentence saying that it is unchanged from RFC 7601. But I am happy to
> hear what IESG has to say about this.
>

Sorry, what's being deleted?  RFC7601bis doesn't (shouldn't!) be deleting
anything; it adds a couple of entries and makes itself authoritative for
the registration of the header field, but otherwise nothing is changing.  I
thought that was pretty explicit.

2) The following took really long time to verify for correctness:
>
> [...]
>
> NEW:
>
> "value" is as defined in Section 5.1 of [MIME], with "quoted-string"
> updated as specified in RFC 6532.
>

Fixed, though I won't post a new one until after LC (unless you think it
would be useful).

-MSK