[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-13.txt
Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 25 May 2021 21:47 UTC
Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB683A0D2D; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WV0x5R67e_BH; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D13803A0B9D; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id b26so32214909lfq.4; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=s6nCJ4YKNsFZFnYrA6e62n7VMbSDLBkgF4DQEf3NmFU=; b=nEGLO3G54nOgAocgvgAnh79dUgiQM+Wb0Ynzoj1J9aJS4/OUO14ibr6cqPZBJvAMoz pqqq+XC3oKJ6/gZ4wCwuqcTg14UAr1DPC8jibdtLnFISt6uai79qYEWPN2Sn54ie2urC 9Qs4ov5HzyrTvBL5nxmuNTXNVbPWsaAprdkrtkRpkUjJRmFNXsRocYvLCCY2yzhnn5b6 KaT8o3LYOXMEnZzOTQYX7JIfqVT9SZBhe+H2xHho4q+9H+iRXBhBHDMKpnpX9smSq0DO w0Xv9M2NglK6IVlxIFSZQAijNJ5D1o9A2GnR49a71AKM4I9KsVpIKiWy7Sde4cgJ+4TK 8xMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=s6nCJ4YKNsFZFnYrA6e62n7VMbSDLBkgF4DQEf3NmFU=; b=s8pzb15vML2xV3ahmlECudhJHZGw0YZBhQ/ByBCgmlZT3g1aJTwekvx1hquhTmUKb2 sbFrgPhEOevs0rT2KEvvwaFOm8JylaXaGthd5agLnE5VMrO0iZXUCWVyrh/mfeok2F6m +TXmkIAAEBoiQl5vrUgqSGSYfOKMNyj0YEi8JuhtO7nC7wuFenFyNDV9l/D4t+p4oUOT qQOCHBd5ntxqMghndQp1nkwftXMzG/YXg/TsY281LFeiYeS6jj9PGdIiuCE19c3myU8/ H8zuXGAJTpy2wfdwKORK5xF+zjXdWkRSvlek3HI2MZodjKRgqvZeT7LvrJczQ2YhSXZm 7ZHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533u8KafWa7ZOrMbfMeKoDYZaSVGJLZg/ztIRMLp/xGyO9batn+P odh2jN4MTW3sVcJ/uuguLGGdEidXNm2hj9ZoxB+50Zrv
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxv/zT86uBUiQwBl1imLaFK3u6qC+kyO45IZ71c8lPjzKh8K8diF4/i3PZySNU4IRnbjUpaEyn9haieq4ZvKQc=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:520a:: with SMTP id a10mr15533991lfl.180.1621979265899; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162197365022.27129.13197834899114998552@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <162197365022.27129.13197834899114998552@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 17:47:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+FUSAAUFXchJOLF+DRmpyYEYghgZfatovO_=dcbj1nwOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Cc: dmarc-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fa1e6605c32e790c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/dZcCFy8SifKMhTw7FWGgf9meHf8>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-13.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 21:47:53 -0000
All This version incorporates all comments from the IESG reviews. There were a number of clarifying comments and editorial edits in here. Thanks tim ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: Tue, May 25, 2021 at 4:14 PM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-13.txt To: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-13.txt has been successfully submitted by Tim Wicinski and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd Revision: 13 Title: Experimental DMARC Extension For Public Suffix Domains Document date: 2021-05-25 Group: dmarc Pages: 15 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-13.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/ Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-13 Abstract: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) permits a domain-controlling organization to express domain- level policies and preferences for message validation, disposition, and reporting, which a mail-receiving organization can use to improve mail handling. DMARC distinguishes the portion of a name that is a Public Suffix Domain (PSD), below which organizational domain names are created. The basic DMARC capability allows organizational domains to specify policies that apply to their subdomains, but it does not give that capability to PSDs. This document describes an extension to DMARC to fully enable DMARC functionality for PSDs. Some implementations of DMARC consider a PSD to be ineligible for DMARC enforcement. This specification addresses that case. The IETF Secretariat
- [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for dr… Tim Wicinski