Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 03 April 2020 00:10 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F803A08F8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 17:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=N1kjSBYA; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=jMnUDMn7
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6VLPXhsrOyb for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D420E3A08ED for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 17:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 59674 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2020 00:10:37 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=e917.5e867efc.k2004; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=Ru71ZcURM9aZhBNmaqjQG8y/vmtyROGAW4wUu4WtJag=; b=N1kjSBYAbj+kxyDAYQG4aynfVzv6U64WzE3jF27j8y9RFVEGJnJrCK5Nl2CU/ebfFnMTJwC0y3YAjkWbmERlac0SW2UuP5H0yQe7SnqcxtD1xqbDqAK8rIrS23dcoRp33KoHB99oOS31SPLem40vrKanSPqBiodUfVqJ52vT+kMmCrx+ULQcmu1BiuufMPorjhsnVeQsxJaLTNMDLJtwoYzt/QF5IZxX94r1eE+U95LerqkHo3QzhSjo1BcEycOL
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=e917.5e867efc.k2004; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=Ru71ZcURM9aZhBNmaqjQG8y/vmtyROGAW4wUu4WtJag=; b=jMnUDMn77YRQCHWt3+87u1iwBN+BZFnA/m4Dcqa+tfOHWeAXYYFFIGZcbHCV9MTPqZVtNjtI04hKU7GsQ/fDy7w5Gf8LfV/028Oj6UOt8z/4BGUulFCGZTAcj/wDXGmjsdHnu6UDay793yN65QhuWRuSRjtVS6dqw4OqoUKK4z7pt0D9DoPBgRZZiXDUnQGRqxBA2gfFCDxVRiwHa+vPGIsVRwEjF7bx4nHsbrrPxnw1RB9wv5YHBPdvCjKpLTjw
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 03 Apr 2020 00:10:36 -0000
Date: 2 Apr 2020 20:10:36 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2004022009360.35755@ary.qy>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Brandon Long" <blong@google.com>
Cc: "IETF DMARC WG" <dmarc@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABa8R6tJXk=-kFRKJaZCMeoS9-2ea-KnpeN1wLVs4E8Jm5z=MA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6b4c7533-ebee-796b-e00e-a2bb4075081f@arcsin.de> <20200402003211.0B8AA16E4B5A@ary.qy> <CABa8R6tJXk=-kFRKJaZCMeoS9-2ea-KnpeN1wLVs4E8Jm5z=MA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (OSX 407 2020-02-09)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/d_Embvp_mGNZhhS2en5z-1eHJQE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:10:51 -0000

>> In systems that keep ASCII and EAI mail separate, that info will be in
>> the metadata, whether it arrived in an SMTP session with the SMTPUTF8
>> option.
>
> Does anyone implement it that way?

I have no idea.  I don't in my code either.

> Unfortunately, everybody thinks they can just make their own emali messages
> because its a text-like format, and they're very often wrong.

Surely you're aware that 50% of all programmers are of below average 
skill.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly