IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] A policy for direct mail flows only, was ARC questions

devel2020@baptiste-carvello.net Tue, 01 December 2020 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <devel2020@baptiste-carvello.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351923A0AAD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 05:27:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hfllaG4-fL1Z for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 05:27:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www210.your-server.de (www210.your-server.de [78.46.0.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82AAD3A0A87 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 05:27:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sslproxy01.your-server.de ([78.46.139.224]) by www210.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <devel2020@baptiste-carvello.net>) id 1kk5gk-0001FV-Go for dmarc@ietf.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 14:27:26 +0100
Received: from [109.190.207.208] (helo=[192.168.1.60]) by sslproxy01.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <devel2020@baptiste-carvello.net>) id 1kk5gk-000EN1-DI for dmarc@ietf.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 14:27:26 +0100
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <e9166148b9564102a652b4764b4f61ff@com> <8c83fffc-077d-9ddb-db2f-b9763361c60f@tana.it> <39eafc5e-3d9c-0bea-1173-7277070195ea@wisc.edu> <081c42a3-492b-89b7-ad76-ccec48dea091@tana.it> <b0f72407-81ce-9990-4a5b-7b0e5b76e3d7@mtcc.com> <2d1dca4f-e46a-646c-9fa3-d9ca56c72196@tana.it> <CABa8R6sV0x8wWmggp98JfXz8jh0GfAmZ+tNkvqnMPnVK534uPQ@mail.gmail.com> <e54e9ff4-59ae-a2ac-7ae9-a8036528a24f@tana.it>
From: devel2020@baptiste-carvello.net
Message-ID: <127cca11-1fef-b75c-65ca-aa7119e295d5@baptiste-carvello.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 14:27:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e54e9ff4-59ae-a2ac-7ae9-a8036528a24f@tana.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Authenticated-Sender: webmaster@baptiste-carvello.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.102.4/26004/Mon Nov 30 15:29:06 2020)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/dkZrXLB5bdaSk1PPRQNsq8C-QBE>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 11:27:16 -0800
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] A policy for direct mail flows only, was ARC questions
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:27:31 -0000

Le 01/12/2020 à 11:37, Alessandro Vesely a écrit :
> 
> [...] a meagre set of old-fashioned individuals who still dislike mass social media [...]

Can decisions please be made based on sound technical reasons rather
than intolerance and zealotry?

Setting aside the form of your argument: no, contracting with Facebook
et al should not be a prerequisite for using the Internet for any
purpose. By the very definition of "open network".

Cheers,
BC

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email