IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Thu, 16 April 2020 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699E63A0EE2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fdblkn0UDQIz for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com (mail-il1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 950F63A0ED9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id z12so8023388ilb.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IOEq/3mCN1AitjqaDqxr19Pdjy08edrAuqu8dNlG+3M=; b=UE1u0M82+KyktBnmDjfduTxkJqphgjR6vxodBSi5IQdCyaaAm53t2/QH9vbc+OdrJE GOiFt0HSvOWLkg+cNt0mU+e/sO3yqkYgUOBz0UsCf+ZIhcgxgJAzTWDdn0rH/vm9FGWn Svt/pzp2ho3hV5+e5Fvv7Zt39/qSODU4+H4fk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IOEq/3mCN1AitjqaDqxr19Pdjy08edrAuqu8dNlG+3M=; b=pCu9n4EcV6CYGChrX8WYyzPhtt23GapOvK1FObMWLXeTGRLT0UEoHCijRUzqKletn0 n3oBuV1EV6NWxgwaSrtyEZYh8r5Xdl+aCZ5kwBprM00proYchR4SkelPQCNuWOO/7wPa zdlSS6O2dXeSAHrxv8l72NinAGuON7MX011LtF0OGASWS7RWonq/j98IQ6IUKe7deso1 wVFaxUli12TuClJm3v3DQPEGl8P2Dpkh0BUH9IkKnnYpM4L9Wpi2NjLOaSNLTmWm1l1A 4KW1kVeImZItaYnXDNRdFHFJDT9+sxt6l2jVxfJ8Rpoi/OCWcRtVP9WmzIljdTrXWcfb kdvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYu1blnR7+4Gw5veAwgObsFksdlNjTSycJTrHGA+Zr8NhFuYx8U mW+h0+vVdMBZMfe2GZaTnYyt6zQnkh9AyuWHoZudbgijBew=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLWXpOiuhN39MwuFZQ7+tCJdyv+0fOLQtoJCjenedJjs+ZuzP3mfl6huB5xa2kVX3D4PEcHN5hLcdwqYMreKIA=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:7301:: with SMTP id o1mr12528152ilc.104.1587064869509; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4666D39F-85F5-4AD2-A754-11FED0A5C169@kitterman.com> <20200416142938.CCD9517E8F5E@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20200416142938.CCD9517E8F5E@ary.qy>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:20:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1r5MZs8S8EtKQaaPRcm1RYxHrE=wm4yKrkFtd1m-c8oSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c875a405a36d55ea"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/dmh_iwbkZhjp15Pat6PgH75ZcDQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:21:18 -0000

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 7:29 AM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> In article <4666D39F-85F5-4AD2-A754-11FED0A5C169@kitterman.com> you write:
> >Perhaps I'm too pessimistic, but I don't think it's possible to actually
> make this clear to anyone that isn't familiar
> >with RFC 7489 without essentially turning this into a proto 7489bis.
>
> I agree.  Hence my suggestion last week to tear out all of the TLD
> stuff or move it into an appendix and just say this is the name above
> the Organizational domain which you can find into RFC 7489.
>
> The reality is that any of the 8000 domains in the PSL could publish a
> PSD record, and I would not want to try to explain to anyone in the
> IESG why most of them are there.  So let's stay as far away from that
> as possible.  Policy Super Domain, remember?


 After an initial "that's too cutesy" reaction, I'm becoming more convinced
that John's suggestion ("policy super domain") might indeed be the right
sort of solution - along with clearly citing 7489 in the intro and abstract
("If you don't know what DMARC is, go read RFC 7489 before coming back
here." or similar).

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email