IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #54 (Limits on recipients per report) - With Interim Notes

Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Thu, 17 June 2021 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF6E3A2046 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2MepHWeu5LO8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D7863A2025 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com with SMTP id f5so1646896qvu.8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kQD+vV1q5z7Xgz24A3caCYHlYDue7ytUreY7/guOf2Y=; b=G9cEBtoeDqUuNfvkKp3PKM11UPwK3Y6//I20i9iXfPz4PymrgBkKZqA93yQAy1miXW HXBD+rZs6SU2LnfGN7qIHXdgFErn6j0BomWXW8wgmPdcnjWlFM+Vr1BIYqtcCWn/xa4M 93hOkhGFW9lGs3DQUaCZCQ7vo+BzvTaFA41cX+vKREXAW1r69+4ks3FEu81aqUt7R5+M xbA+DE31whw6NZezZXMLyAGvlikbuCdYURYuuwMYeA/dYemvr34NYueei0rZtQRp3Zyz LgAixGO4UjaX7rIXLxugYsSbp+Dwt8EA/ls+zdvFApXFClbSQUMz/1C+53gpZrE2wBZd v87Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=kQD+vV1q5z7Xgz24A3caCYHlYDue7ytUreY7/guOf2Y=; b=npzalFcO0pspKCoUG+iaR3/6qVlfVb/lnDRl1VW9tXgs90j1Pho4QfwR14KoP5uc04 ON/VdOVPrMXPyJMSS8UkTeIPYMt81MraT4+G3gIKU+GETs/ny7SW4EKTIMOvEUdDhwbR WRUStAxBeMQiLImD0v+JUJmxdIYOoq09pOSeG28X/nj6GXHNFNCxSxZ7Agqq6QRd5rc1 vxe2d2xbJDJWeOPgElxeUl7BjJQFqZJNjUUyZIZXVvf0UPofMkFmimB+gZSierH2BFQG pdqtH1fBuUmbarxMFDrWDwJp6J/H4O23AMxFxC/DZnvIkDc7MaDc3XzdvqFBr8x9UM61 1rAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LIm0uy1sPNIPQT0sWOMydD3H3C/deoUYYIhsrJEshFBmdfeOb biIPpi68WfR1ISvNWEh38+FYg6lsy0BYtGgNMhH7u5/3WKIKvg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5MTpDEwceT54juUUUIix6kwDG6Zr8h0jM/zgqp6I4GME0IKLdJD9IT8+0xFOIM14BL/5qi+2/6t4F7zFMPnI=
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:45a6:: with SMTP id y6mr6087254qvu.54.1623937394341; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHej_8nmJCVwaTxVHdFL8j65ZcWd6B5f7qKQsvfY4eUoe_exrA@mail.gmail.com> <a17a4c1e-a66e-e7f0-ef81-98e2947df6f9@crash.com>
In-Reply-To: <a17a4c1e-a66e-e7f0-ef81-98e2947df6f9@crash.com>
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:42:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHej_8mqa_rFc5F-4dJLxNK-fwE4r3-BGh3XydwZii7NaT4dPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000870ddb05c4f663c2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/drS3n-YJhkynyo5uLZkih-Ef3bc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #54 (Limits on recipients per report) - With Interim Notes
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:43:26 -0000

I have closed the subject ticket and incorporated relevant text
changes in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-02,
which will be published on Datatracker as soon as the chairs have a chance
to do so.

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:59 PM Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com> wrote:

> On 5/28/21 08:46, Todd Herr wrote:
>
>
> Consensus on Ticket #54 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/54>
> (Remove or expand limits on number of recipients per report) was reached
> during the May 27 DMARC Interim to update the text in the DMARC URIs
> section to read:
>
> The place such URIs are specified (see Section 6.3
> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-01.html#general-record-format>)
> allows a list of these to be provided. The list of URIs is separated by
> commas (ASCII 0x2c). A report SHOULD be sent to each listed URI provided in
> the DMARC record.
>
> This proposed change will be made in the next version of dmarcbis,
> scheduled for release in the next few weeks.
>
>
> I support the change.
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>


-- 

*Todd Herr* | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email