IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 30 December 2020 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760A33A08A5 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:54:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=h/5woOQQ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=HSFDt0wZ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rxOg2-IH6gI0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:54:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9658F3A08A9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:54:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 3722 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2020 20:54:32 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=e82.5fece908.k2012; bh=8vsMesgjo2SO+wTc8KpNY7dbuF4FgOu+i7fJ2oUKHeQ=; b=h/5woOQQ5Iy5gzS+Q0kThaHqUKkjQRZX5P6SdTVL314mo5Ykv3Kj+r8rTBK/dWO4GA0CLh/gnEoNbeOX3YYl9lxizE3kIxQ0o7GdceMMyzgyQcA3KqdHKCzg4nuuU2ENXgNbeWKV+t9tGP4f+lm0zvcVxu3FJHJNoElE4ndQoDmwQB1sISeTo9H9QSmTN59Za78KH3ECTwqQ6tkcUUSqbHvmoIgdiTNZh7DAEM2+p30ioPzSfcbaWN45A2YtWcUER7Kh4FGgEMuQWJoYxPfd//lzWydEArkoUZeLnRLMPg/Su3fbyBIDRiGLMP5TL+b6CCLZdMduL/xkgoNfeRS/lA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=e82.5fece908.k2012; bh=8vsMesgjo2SO+wTc8KpNY7dbuF4FgOu+i7fJ2oUKHeQ=; b=HSFDt0wZsUUjbIqoiih5QNcIW47fHRKy+1CPJBrLJ1JclaqnmFtxK6nGbz6KXcOjh1Ta/66IyfPQXoR22D+ATOP7XZ7PwdAcJ87G2vVAoTve074Rup3L6MZeOqQFsNF5d0IumDBh8ub9/suUlvQCW3hI5fIvOly/CMaKboEoNOOJYyBaagAG7jAsXHyzmayQBBmqOw8PajZJCrg4FTtIvZ5euoaSvln4HXdeh4y7rKtArXbvQZnMxTmwWlJL0RgPdx7TdqD+j7DF9rTjK57uyLE/0HDn8/nXMVVdyaFT3djrYFlcXqhDm1ADZIz92VFgnU72JL9+mIT9DEPmwosPmQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 30 Dec 2020 20:54:32 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id F03C83AA0126; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:54:31 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:54:31 -0500
Message-Id: <20201230205431.F03C83AA0126@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: vesely@tana.it
In-Reply-To: <2717cf5f-bec9-d561-d7f7-ac167dc7ca6f@tana.it>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/e3Ra58WLLfZV5ukZUdjrII29Sqc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] auth-res vs. dmarc
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 20:54:38 -0000

In article <2717cf5f-bec9-d561-d7f7-ac167dc7ca6f@tana.it> you write:
>>>         dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mrochek.com
>>> The policy statement is right there: p=NONE.
>>>
>> No. That is not guaranteed whatsoever. It could say "(eat at Joe's)" and be valid.
>
>
>Correct.  However, it could have been:
>
>     dmarc=fail policy.dmarc=none header.from=mrochek.com

Ticket #86 already suggests we define a few more items to put in a DMARC A-R
clause so we don't have to try and guess them from comments.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email