IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt

Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Thu, 28 April 2022 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002CFC159A2A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uHuOO4mFqAEZ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19AEEC1595E5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id r27so1707232iot.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=EFVL8m1FtOQc1GIu3hpTnUAMKdCCuZ1ZFwoL1iSvyNY=; b=gMrekoWGyMRuaHokOmQzZMR/oqbpP8CasT2fKKGudVN7b9QbLY0vsH8VHKBqY080iL fczjiXg21DGIcreh0GCoQFZ5ny7LWgj884zfPG17VWDL7CB8t/VWfl+m4U8Qjip+XGoz wd73di8ro4usAjyGXL1bo6p3LhWn8XUCTa+5VmoJzq8/7ab8NUlj9DMTxCG0Az8lCXik 71v9AoCb8Sw+sPx2jbRIofrZPSgFguO/kfe/NyqO7Ckb24MPIr818B+1r8bdkYAY07HO jCi7eO2/Dm9aezJjgTqfsp3HHpXx4x6RiklpRfQuucH7rIS9Qobf26+ACF9gKxSEo/mu fwiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=EFVL8m1FtOQc1GIu3hpTnUAMKdCCuZ1ZFwoL1iSvyNY=; b=eJIEetZ3ja5gE8Bs4e55HMtpXUjMLH37C1aFhJfYL67qA6MBG4KmqqixIl6eoa9HBS zJqebf4Ox7Ih976Al981bfOe7lVBIycr7hl73E6to8Zkviw7pKmG7f8WOkEgvee1P1zV CL0BOJoJQqXOo/1Kg+XBX8MBqtZVjpSV2VRtf3T1bRcqAoJyXAI1ny77iZl0LhoOAVSg mV78wOitZUN2jCEGG5xLRKSDcpKV0b4aMg+4Z3dxcBsZQi4J/qBnovDMEZzy40jSp/0y w306hNBiQpEX37+0PNKFlHlwr23jmzq/i7Zqa/70HCtKY8SJMndEz3BkuJYvMuJDHRjy mVcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530MrrQvbWRraMTy5WEI2wQi39qkJ2GhQ3sVmp9xv7tHelvvcdLE FBtSa0i055wpwZC8W3MBBEPmMr/jQCQUi9aL/CSfpTvTm0Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXDFc7AKXW9gKfA4+TiB9gcNGSIL8lLRQf71s6Fq4e+fuPKQK3i2/VR6d5EAVDrNAKCLiOqH+dZq2r/DXQ0PQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:3493:b0:329:b647:4aa8 with SMTP id t19-20020a056638349300b00329b6474aa8mr14575267jal.226.1651155550642; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164925666278.4445.13789431014958416691@ietfa.amsl.com> <30789809-B1ED-4757-86CC-0E3C571B1299@kitterman.com> <CAHej_8=9JsLyXRTXCdh1h918o8ZUPVEMfZB0W760c51s2SWKSA@mail.gmail.com> <8511537.A12uD9ORHo@zini-1880>
In-Reply-To: <8511537.A12uD9ORHo@zini-1880>
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 10:18:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHej_8=J85cAgADt6wmrWuReMaDkAshqfYZs7kk6g7687dqw=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000010b68305ddb79c30"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/eE11AMufVngDl147jbGvtA22Fq4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:19:16 -0000

On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 11:33 PM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

>
> I've looked at it again and I think the paragraph can simply be deleted
> (see
> attached for rfcdiff).  It looks to me like this is addressed adequately
> in the
> main text of the section, which now includes:
>
> >    *  The RFC5321.MailFrom domain if there is an SPF pass result for the
> >       message.
> >
> >    *  Any DKIM d= domain if there is a DKIM pass result for the message
> >       for that domain.
>
> That adequately covers the question of if a tree walk is needed to find an
> SPF/
> DKIM related org domain.
>
>
Apologies for the delayed reply; I was away for a few days.

This will be updated in rev -08 when it's released.
-- 

*Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email