IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] A-R results for DMARC

Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com> Tue, 08 December 2020 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496673A0DD7 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 19:20:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2jL1jLzi7xI9 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 19:20:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92f.google.com (mail-ua1-x92f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E69C3A0DCB for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 19:20:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92f.google.com with SMTP id f29so2945036uab.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 19:20:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VEmqUJkXK8YS/TyJcYswgaUMJUyQ4PHPbf6fWCHjYRU=; b=LCEEI0aTADbxs9C8umRvVxCC8QkLezq6g86BrJQrTV5cROGaUZxlRwGG1o1bAJspTe /fUmJi3dLntj/aCI+vVW1bdppwsYOXMkDaRoKFE6s9/Q3s623j6XIWKpgwVnzUC6DERV XDgMc1+hNIM9wE0DJj9Pv1dcpZCtUJygIuSV6pFwF+B/g86rLpBTudLn3nKnte80A8AT Vwht5SL5j/6QqEZX23e9WKg4jmsIUV3tjyEcG0sn/V+7GqluOqU899qvKzQcRnCIH/zw 2y8k3xXogUtpixiiZ6J9YZpzLKqHpscri2oGl3zUTHqoz7m/jeVdWD8WQRBsaoAWRSPA H92A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VEmqUJkXK8YS/TyJcYswgaUMJUyQ4PHPbf6fWCHjYRU=; b=pBz2o46sAVagYfk03BN0JFZYs/6RR5NPXnAL4bxaOrhg7bjp6T1C+aHjsV++6NC8Mr tkgMYZSlhPYPKFtWVHMk2dvrUn0wwRety68lZqPPn5v8vQtN1ld4y1Oo0zMartGfNSY6 Lqlb46EkWT6BjoagtBMv2JYy4QsMCmvko1hrDxWhAIuVKK7AOkFvQ2d0vKB5tSJW+TIJ PfuRPVQE5ss7MzBMtytPpKLsQ94FwbApI3MI1zFzzOvsa0i9VMC74AafJncTS+2mnm6h smfLWPyLVwQJ3d3jUdovG62OmMqEZLEJgdeOesbRqcsd1sT11QKpv95unKc8h0BRMTdM R/qQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533E7taa3sDqwfaMnz3S+c2YeRmcRCJzfPT6WJLsJEU/KjykvCYo 9t7/lHiTw1bISPDHNjQ46YVjoVqfrUWAQhF6UGQ/jT9Gs3c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxf7tSICuzfRoJG2yNoQ9GCWij5hYOm9Ipuqd7OLoRiYdp6dC866yap1Rr2tAP9+mtqI5nz3l//SLVb2jmJaLM=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:67d4:: with SMTP id w20mr13934453uar.47.1607397610050; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 19:20:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201208031609.C8CC52926414@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20201208031609.C8CC52926414@ary.qy>
From: Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 19:19:59 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOZAAfP7oMkPYrSfpXPU2pme-_EVQk+S-ro8RsQbPr8viAc57g@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008f68e105b5eb6bca"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/eGDEMrP-LDleAryHK1Y75M9Y1PA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] A-R results for DMARC
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 03:20:13 -0000

Please open a ticket, agreed that standardization here is a good thing.

I have some further thoughts as an individual once the ticket is opened.

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 19:16 John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> I don't think there is a ticket for this, but it would be nice if
> there were standard ways to put a few more items into the DMARC part
> of an A-R header, in particular the p= and pct= values and the
> location of the policy record if it's not the same as header.from.
>
> None of the existing ptypes really apply here (in particular "policy" is
> for local policy, not a policy you found somewhere else.)  Perhaps call
> it polrec for policy record and add polrec.p polrec.pct and polrec.domain.
>
> I have never understood all of the indirection involved in defining
> stuff for A-R but I'm hoping Murray can help out.
>
> R's,
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>
-- 

*Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies
*e:* seth@valimail.com
*p:* 415.273.8818


This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email